2006
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.200541348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three real‐space discretization techniques in electronic structure calculations

Abstract: Published online zzz PACS 71.15.Ap, 71.15.Dx A characteristic feature of the state-of-the-art of real-space methods in electronic structure calculations is the diversity of the techniques used in the discretization of the relevant partial differential equations. In this context, the main approaches include finite-difference methods, various types of finite-elements and wavelets. This paper reports on the results of several code development projects that approach problems related to the electronic structure… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
(320 reference statements)
1
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The positron was treated using the MIKA/ Doppler package. 43 All electronic structure calculations were performed using a 216-atom GaSb zincblende supercell. The defect structures were relaxed with a convergence criteria for forces of 0.01 eV/Å also taking into account the forces exerted on the ions by the localized positron.…”
Section: B Computationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positron was treated using the MIKA/ Doppler package. 43 All electronic structure calculations were performed using a 216-atom GaSb zincblende supercell. The defect structures were relaxed with a convergence criteria for forces of 0.01 eV/Å also taking into account the forces exerted on the ions by the localized positron.…”
Section: B Computationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculations were performed with the MIKA/ Doppler package using 1000 atom supercells. 7,10,32 The electron-positron enhancement factor obtained from the data of Arponen and Pajanne, 33 both the original by parameterization by Boronski and Nieminen (BN), 34 described within the local density approximation (LDA), and with an expression obtained by Barbiellini and co-workers 35,36 (referred to as AP), described within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) were used. The LDA calculations with BN enhancement assumed a value of 7.1 for the CdTe high frequency dielectric constant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We solve the Kohn-Sham equation without resort to an explicit basis [8,9,10,11,12]. We solve for the wave functions on the grid with a fixed domain, which encompasses the physical system of interest.…”
Section: V^vh(f) = -4nep(f)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within a "real space" approach, one can solve the eigenvalue problem using a finite element or finite difference approach [9,12]. We use a higher order finite difference approach owing to its simplicity in implementation.…”
Section: V^vh(f) = -4nep(f)mentioning
confidence: 99%