1995
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)00012-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three practical criteria of comparison among ordinal preference aggregating rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, a statistical method named Borda's rule (Pérez et al . ) is applied to aggregate for each sample its ordinal position with respect to different visual variables. A vector containing the aggregated rankings of all the samples is obtained in this manner.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, a statistical method named Borda's rule (Pérez et al . ) is applied to aggregate for each sample its ordinal position with respect to different visual variables. A vector containing the aggregated rankings of all the samples is obtained in this manner.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel approach based on the fusion of rough sets (Pawlak ), fuzzy inference (Dubois et al . ; Takagi and Sugeno ), fuzzy neural network (Jang ), and statistical methods (Siegel ; Pérez and Barba‐Romero ) is proposed to explore the relations between different sensory information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, BAK implicitly assumes that DMs are able to rank all alternatives from first to last despite findings that such all-at-once comparisons can be quite difficult for many people (Jensen, 1986). Perez and Barba-Romero (1995) proposed three criteria: the frequency/intensity of internal consistencies, the ability to discriminate the best alternatives, and the complexity of the algorithms.…”
Section: The Study and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest but weakest measure on the alternatives x 1 , F F F ,x m under the criterion C k is the ordinal ranking based on z k x 1 , F F F ,z k x m X These ordinal rankings under the p criteria can be used to choose between any two alternatives x i and x j [15]. Let Cx i , x j fk:x i ranks better than x j under the criterion C k g and jCx i , x j j denotes the number of criteria in Cx i , x j X If each criterion is counted as one vote, then the jCx i , x j j is the number of votes supporting x i in the binary choice among x i and x j X When jCx i , x j j b pa2, the alternative x i has majority support of the p criteria and is selected over x j by majority consensus.…”
Section: Weights As Vote Values In Binary Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%