2009
DOI: 10.3390/medicina45110112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-part Oppel-Kundt illusory figure

Abstract: The Oppel-Kundt illusion was examined in the psychophysical experiments with the classical two-part stimuli and modified three-part figures. The modified versions comprised either one filled medial interval and two empty flanking intervals or one empty space situated in between two fillings. The illusion was measured as a function of the number of filling elements in the referential parts of the figures. The curves obtained by two modified figures and by the original two-part stimulus were quite similar in sha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some additivity of illusory effects was revealed in experiments with the three-part Oppel-Kundt figure (one empty interval flanked by two filled ones, Fig. 1B), which induced an illusion about a quarter stronger than that caused by the conventional two-part figure (Bertulis et al 2009). Although different modifications of the filled-space illusion have been rather well studied experimentally, at present there is as yet no generally accepted explanation for the occurrence of this visual phenomenon.…”
Section: Research Papermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some additivity of illusory effects was revealed in experiments with the three-part Oppel-Kundt figure (one empty interval flanked by two filled ones, Fig. 1B), which induced an illusion about a quarter stronger than that caused by the conventional two-part figure (Bertulis et al 2009). Although different modifications of the filled-space illusion have been rather well studied experimentally, at present there is as yet no generally accepted explanation for the occurrence of this visual phenomenon.…”
Section: Research Papermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…49–52) rather than slant perception. A typical Oppel-Kundt figure uses tick lines for the filling elements, while the illusion also occurs with dots (Bertulis et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it seemed doubtful that the stimuli with two disks yielded the Oppel-Kundt illusion because the illusion weakens for stimuli with few filling elements (<5) and even reverses (i.e., underestimation of length) for stimuli filled with one element (Bertulis et al, 2009; Coren & Girgus, 1978, p. 27; Mikellidou & Thompson, 2014; Rentschler et al, 1981). Taken together, it is unlikely that the illusory effect shown in Figure 1A is wholly attributable to the Oppel-Kundt illusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three spatial interval stimuli (Fig. 1) were used in the experiments, as possessing left-right symmetry and producing stronger illusions; the three-part O-K figure with two filled intervals flanking the empty part induced a 25% stronger illusion than the two-part figure with one filled interval (Bertulis et al 2009). The control stimulus was comprised of four spots (Fig.…”
Section: Stimuli and Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%