2015
DOI: 10.14359/51687180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Parameter Kinematic Theory for Shear Behavior of Continuous Deep Beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3PKT is based on a kinematic model with three degrees of freedom (DOFs), which is an extension of a two-parameter model for deep beams (Mihaylov et al 2013). This model describes the deformed shape of the member and links local and global deformations, which is important for addressing performance limits in the assessment of existing structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The 3PKT is based on a kinematic model with three degrees of freedom (DOFs), which is an extension of a two-parameter model for deep beams (Mihaylov et al 2013). This model describes the deformed shape of the member and links local and global deformations, which is important for addressing performance limits in the assessment of existing structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the expression in the brackets is the height over which the stirrups are activated by the expansion of the web (Mihaylov et al 2013). Quantity l b1e in Eq.…”
Section: Kinematics Of Shear Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Over 500 tests [6] have been carried out on simply supported beams loaded with one point load within 2d of supports of which [7][8][9][10][11][12] are typical but as acknowledged by Brown and Bayrak [7] there is a scarcity of data for beams with multiple point loads. To fill gaps in the existing data, the authors tested five simply supported beams with two point loads positioned within 2d of each support (six point loading) for which BS8110 and EC2 give significantly different strength predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%