“…In recent years several studies on copepods showed that combining molecular and morphological methods can help answer questions related to cryptic speciation ( Bláha et al 2010 ; Sakaguchi and Ueda 2010 ; Karanovic and Krajicek 2012a , Hamrova et al 2012 ), invasions of new habitats and colonisation pathways ( Lee et al 2003 , 2007 ; Winkler et al 2008 ; Karanovic and Cooper 2011a , 2012 ), anthropogenic translocation ( Karanovic and Krajicek 2012a ), short range endemism and allopatry ( Karanovic and Cooper 2011a ), and definition of supraspecific taxa in conservative genera or families ( Huys et al 2006 , 2007 , 2009 , 2012 ; Wyngaard et al 2010 ; Karanovic and Cooper 2011b , Karanovic and Krajicek 2012b , Karanovic and Kim 2014 ). However, some studies showed that currently prevailing morphological methods of identifying copepod species are inadequate, and suggested the use of alternative microstructures, such as pores and sensilla pattern on somites ( Alekseev et al 2006 ; Karanovic and Krajicek 2012a ; Karanovic and Cho 2012 ; Karanovic and Kim 2014 ; Karanovic and Lee 2012 ; Karanovic et al 2012 , 2013 ), an approach also tested in this study.…”