Three models of community mental health services In low-income countries

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare and contrast three models of community mental health services in low-income settings.Data Sources/Study SettingPrimary and secondary data collected before, during, and after site visits to mental health programs in Nigeria, the Philippines, and India.Study DesignQualitative case study methodology.Data CollectionData were collected through interviews and observations during site visits to the programs, as well as from reviews of documentary evidence.Principal FindingsA set of narrative topics and program indicators were used to compare and contrast three community mental health programs in low-income countries. This allowed us to identify a diversity of service delivery models, common challenges, and the strengths and weaknesses of each program. More definitive evaluations will require the establishment of data collection methods and information systems that provide data about the clinical and social outcomes of clients, as well as their use of services.ConclusionsCommunity mental health programs in low-income countries face a number of challenges. Using a case study methodology developed for this purpose, it is possible to compare programs and begin to assess the effectiveness of diverse service delivery models.

Prevalence of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in the Kashmir Valley

“…47 The weighted population prevalence rate for psychological distress (ie, for symptoms of depression, anxiety and PTSD combined) based on the cut points of the screening instruments was 45% (95% CI 42.6 to 47.0). Forty-one per cent (95% CI 39.2 to 43.4) exhibited signs of probable depression, 26% (95% CI 17.5 to 21.2) signs of probable anxiety and 19% (95% CI 23.8 to 27.5) signs of probable PTSD.…”

Integration of mental health into primary healthcare in low-income countries: Avoiding medicalization

“…In this light, the adoption of the United Nations Convention for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (United Nations, 2006) is highly important as this document explicitly defi nes disability not as the attribute of a person, but as a product of the interaction of people with functional impairments and environmental factors, including social support. There are several well-documented programmes in low-resource settings that show contextually relevant mental healthcare can be delivered to people who are disabled by chronic mental disorders (Cohen et al, 2011).…”

Impact evaluations of mental health programmes: the missing piece in global mental health

“…However, a key finding of this research is that almost none of the programmes conducted adequate internal or external evaluations 9 12. Lastly, in a systematic review of impact evaluations in peer-reviewed and grey literature conducted in 2013, we found only 136 evaluations of the coverage, effectiveness and/or costs of mental health programmes globally 14.…”

“…Isolated efforts have been made to systematically document mental health programmes, such as the case studies programme which has so far conducted detailed case studies of nine programmes 12 13. However, a key finding of this research is that almost none of the programmes conducted adequate internal or external evaluations 9 12.…”