2017
DOI: 10.1049/joe.2017.0149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three‐level boost converter with zero voltage transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the component count point of view, the proposed converter needs relatively fewer elements, however, converters [14,15,18] utilize a large number of components and have a complex structure. Also, converters [6,10,20] are made up of fewer elements, but their voltage gain is low, and [6] suffers from a very high switch voltage stress and reverse recovery losses. Looking at the switch voltage stress, it can be seen that the proposed converter endures the lowest voltage stress across its switches, while, converters [6,8,9,13,16] face a considerably high switch voltage stress.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From the component count point of view, the proposed converter needs relatively fewer elements, however, converters [14,15,18] utilize a large number of components and have a complex structure. Also, converters [6,10,20] are made up of fewer elements, but their voltage gain is low, and [6] suffers from a very high switch voltage stress and reverse recovery losses. Looking at the switch voltage stress, it can be seen that the proposed converter endures the lowest voltage stress across its switches, while, converters [6,8,9,13,16] face a considerably high switch voltage stress.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at the switch voltage stress, it can be seen that the proposed converter endures the lowest voltage stress across its switches, while, converters [6,8,9,13,16] face a considerably high switch voltage stress. With a closer look at [10], though it has a fewer number of elements and a switch voltage stress equal to the proposed converter, it requires two magnetic cores, has a very low voltage gain, and suffers from reverse recovery losses. In terms of the converter cost, it can be observed that the proposed converter is cheaper than its counterparts.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations