1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1004(1996)8:1<57::aid-humu8>3.0.co;2-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three keratin gene mutations account for the majority of dominant simplex epidermolysis bullosa cases within the population of Ireland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All previously reported mutations which cause PC have affected one of the highly conserved sequences at either end of this helical rod domain common to all keratin molecules (Munro, 2001), except a mutation in the midregion of the 2B helical domain of K16 reported by Connors et al (2001) in a patient with delayed-onset PC-1. Interestingly, mutations in the second half of the 1A domain have been associated with other keratin disorders, for example equivalent residue in keratin 5 (K5), N193K (N25K in the 1A domain) causes mild Weber-Cockayne form of epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS) (Humphries et al, 1996). In EBS, the site of mutation is a strong determinant of the severity of the phenotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All previously reported mutations which cause PC have affected one of the highly conserved sequences at either end of this helical rod domain common to all keratin molecules (Munro, 2001), except a mutation in the midregion of the 2B helical domain of K16 reported by Connors et al (2001) in a patient with delayed-onset PC-1. Interestingly, mutations in the second half of the 1A domain have been associated with other keratin disorders, for example equivalent residue in keratin 5 (K5), N193K (N25K in the 1A domain) causes mild Weber-Cockayne form of epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS) (Humphries et al, 1996). In EBS, the site of mutation is a strong determinant of the severity of the phenotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EBS-Dowling-Meara mutation p.Ser181Pro is a point mutation (c.541T4C) resulting in a serine to proline substitution in the highly conserved helix initiation motif within the 1A domain of K5 (Shemanko et al, 2000). The missense mutation p.Asn193Lys (due to DNA point mutation c.579C4G) is located in the second half of the helix 1A domain of K5, outside of the highly conserved region (Humphries et al, 1996;Rugg et al, 2007). This mutation has been shown to be associated with milder, siterestricted presentation of EBS (Humphries et al, 1996;Rugg et al, 2007).…”
Section: Inhibition Of K5 Expression By Specific Sirnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For KRT5, a genomic mutation detection system has already been described (Stephens et al, 1997), as for the KRT14 hotspot domains (Hut et al, 2000). Although most of the EBS mutations could be identified in the mutation hotspots of KRT5 and KRT14, occasionally a mutation is located outside the hotspots (Jonkman et al, 1996;Humphries et al, 1996;Liovic et al, 2001). Upon screening of nine patients, we found two patients, one with EBS-Koebner and the other one with EBS-Weber-Cockayne, both with no detectable mutation in the hotspot domains of KRT5 and KRT14, suggesting a mutation outside the hotspot domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%