1999
DOI: 10.3109/17453679908997826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three isolation techniques for primary culture of human osteoblast-like cells: A comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2,[6][7][8] Osteoblasts, in particular, have been implicated in controlling HSC numbers, and studies in gene-targeted 2 and hormone-treated 6,9 mice show a strong correlation between experimentally induced expansion of osteoblasts and increased HSC frequency. Significantly, most studies of osteoblast function as it relates to HSC have relied on complex in vivo models [10][11][12][13] or on in vitro systems in which osteoblasts are derived ex vivo by extended culture of calvarial precursor cells. 10 Although clearly suggestive, these in vivo analyses are complicated by the unavoidable presence of other, nonosteoblastic cell types, whereas in vitro studies of culture-derived osteoblasts are challenged by the possibility that extended culture may induce changes in osteoblast behavior and/or may fail to properly recapitulate the in vivo conditions under which osteoblasts normally would be formed or regulated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,[6][7][8] Osteoblasts, in particular, have been implicated in controlling HSC numbers, and studies in gene-targeted 2 and hormone-treated 6,9 mice show a strong correlation between experimentally induced expansion of osteoblasts and increased HSC frequency. Significantly, most studies of osteoblast function as it relates to HSC have relied on complex in vivo models [10][11][12][13] or on in vitro systems in which osteoblasts are derived ex vivo by extended culture of calvarial precursor cells. 10 Although clearly suggestive, these in vivo analyses are complicated by the unavoidable presence of other, nonosteoblastic cell types, whereas in vitro studies of culture-derived osteoblasts are challenged by the possibility that extended culture may induce changes in osteoblast behavior and/or may fail to properly recapitulate the in vivo conditions under which osteoblasts normally would be formed or regulated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is not clear whether one can extrapolate results from rat or murine cell lines to non-transformed human bone cells, we have used primary cultures of normal human osteoblast-like cells in this report. This is currently believed to be the most reliable cell culture system since it reflects processes occumng in human bone and we have recently optimized an isolation technique providing cells with a mature osteoblastic phenotype (Jonsson et al 1999). Using these cells, we here demonstrate that thrombin stimulates proliferation in non-transformed human osteoblasts and that the mechanism appears to involve the tetheric G-protein coupled thrombin receptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Trabecular bone cylinders of the central part of the femoral head (thus avoiding the fractured and the subchondral regions) were obtained with a trephine, washed extensively in phosphate-buffered saline, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C or used to generate primary human osteoblasts (hOBs) by the explant technique. 40 The osteoblastic phenotype was confirmed by the ability to express osteocalcin when stimulated with vitamin D and to form a mineralized matrix. hOBs were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%