2010 Ninth International Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Methods in Verification, and Second International Workshop on Hig 2010
DOI: 10.1109/pdmc-hibi.2010.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three High Performance Architectures in the Parallel APMC Boat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the increase in the communication time. When the number of cores in parallel and pattern length increase, the parallel and sequential times are decrease in the long and short pattern lengths [13], [23].…”
Section: Discussion and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is due to the increase in the communication time. When the number of cores in parallel and pattern length increase, the parallel and sequential times are decrease in the long and short pattern lengths [13], [23].…”
Section: Discussion and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA dataset obtained good performance with all number of cores because there are only four characters in the DNA dataset which possesses short parallel time in comparison to the sequential time for the same data type. Moreover, the parallel time decreased when the pattern length increased [23]. Furthermore, the algorithm technique is dependent upon the hash function that is used to calculate the hash value of three characters only in the first step.…”
Section: Discussion and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overhead increases when the number of cores increases, due to the increase in the communication time, alongside the increase in the number of cores [24]. Through the use of 1GB data size of DNA, Protein and English database types as shown in Tables 1, 2, and 3.…”
Section: Parallel Execution Time Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%