Three genetic–environmental networks for human personality

Abstract

Phylogenetic, developmental, and brain-imaging studies suggest that human personality is the integrated expression of three major systems of learning and memory that regulate (1) associative conditioning, (2) intentionality, and (3) self-awareness. We have uncovered largely disjoint sets of genes regulating these dissociable learning processes in different clusters of people with (1) unregulated temperament profiles (i.e., associatively conditioned habits and emotional reactivity), (2) organized character profiles (i.e., intentional self-control of emotional conflicts and goals), and (3) creative character profiles (i.e., self-aware appraisal of values and theories), respectively. However, little is known about how these temperament and character components of personality are jointly organized and develop in an integrated manner. In three large independent genome-wide association studies from Finland, Germany, and Korea, we used a data-driven machine learning method to uncover joint phenotypic networks of temperament and character and also the genetic networks with which they are associated. We found three clusters of similar numbers of people with distinct combinations of temperament and character profiles. Their associated genetic and environmental networks were largely disjoint, and differentially related to distinct forms of learning and memory. Of the 972 genes that mapped to the three phenotypic networks, 72% were unique to a single network. The findings in the Finnish discovery sample were blindly and independently replicated in samples of Germans and Koreans. We conclude that temperament and character are integrated within three disjoint networks that regulate healthy longevity and dissociable systems of learning and memory by nearly disjoint sets of genetic and environmental influences.

Personality Traits as Markers of Psychosis Risk in Kenya: Assessment of Temperament and Character

“… 66 However, it should be noted that the highly cooperative individuals in our sample who had high neurocognitive functioning had the “organized profile” in which both self-directedness and cooperativeness are high (see table 4 ); such individuals are distinguished by their excellent executive functions and logical reasoning. 67 Bergvall and Hansen 68 previously reported an association of low cooperativeness and low self-directedness with attentional set-shifting. In violent offenders, intellectual ability was also related to low cooperativeness and self-transcendence, but also to harm avoidance, novelty seeking and self-transcendence.…”

Uncovering Tumour Heterogeneity through PKR and nc886 Analysis in Metastatic Colon Cancer Patients Treated with 5-FU-Based Chemotherapy

“…In order to group patients sharing similar features within the existing heterogeneity, we approached this ambispective study using NMF techniques encoded into the PGMRA system [20]. This system was successfully used to identify complex genotypic-phenotypic architecture of mental disorders and personality traits [40], which has now been customized for cancer phenotypes. In contrast to classical clustering techniques, not all features are included in such associations, but only those that provide a multifaceted description of groups of patients at risk.…”

The Ways the Theory of Physics Education Can Evolve

“…As well we can be sure the Theory of Physics Education will keep up with research on humanities. We already know a lot about the human personality (Cloninger, 2004;Zwir, 2019), ways of thinking (diSessa, 2017), abductive reasoning (Magnani, 2017). Both ways will determine the development in each of the clusters: teaching-learning; digital technology use and the methods of research.…”