2008
DOI: 10.1075/la.132.05gia
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three fundamental issues in parametric linguistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Icelandic (but also in most Indo-European languages) this will have the outcome at two levels: at LF (propositional thought) and at PF (full agreement on V). The identification of a functional category (here TP) as postulated by Vangsnes (2002) could be then satisfied by V-T movement, which is possible in CNSLs like Polish whose Vs bear the pronominal D-feature (Vangsnes 2002;Biberauer 2010;Alexiadou and Anagnostopoulou 1998;Gianollo, Guardiano and Longobardi 2008) and impossible in PNSLs like Icelandic whose T 0 and V are D-less and hence force an overt pronoun which is referential/definite (Vangsnes 2002 calls it a [deixis] feature). If [Spec, vP] is left empty no predication can take place as predicted from our previous discussion:…”
Section: Polish and Icelandic Constructions With (Pro)nominalsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…and Icelandic (but also in most Indo-European languages) this will have the outcome at two levels: at LF (propositional thought) and at PF (full agreement on V). The identification of a functional category (here TP) as postulated by Vangsnes (2002) could be then satisfied by V-T movement, which is possible in CNSLs like Polish whose Vs bear the pronominal D-feature (Vangsnes 2002;Biberauer 2010;Alexiadou and Anagnostopoulou 1998;Gianollo, Guardiano and Longobardi 2008) and impossible in PNSLs like Icelandic whose T 0 and V are D-less and hence force an overt pronoun which is referential/definite (Vangsnes 2002 calls it a [deixis] feature). If [Spec, vP] is left empty no predication can take place as predicted from our previous discussion:…”
Section: Polish and Icelandic Constructions With (Pro)nominalsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Variation, and hence potential change, is due to legibility conditions at the interface with the conceptual-intentional 7 Actually, the study of absence of change, that is, of pertinacity in language histories yields important insights into the structure and the source of cross-linguistic variation, as Nichols (1992Nichols ( , 2003 has shown. Gianollo, Guardiano, and Longobardi (2008), Crisma and Longobardi (2009: 6-10). For syntax, the persistence of parametric values has been argued to convey a genealogical signal, which can be used to reconstruct phylogenetic relations among languages, cf.…”
Section: Variation and Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For syntax, the persistence of parametric values has been argued to convey a genealogical signal, which can be used to reconstruct phylogenetic relations among languages, cf. in terms of parametric schemata by Gianollo, Guardiano, and Longobardi 2008), and as clustering in virtue of their implicational relations (modeled as parametric hierarchies in Roberts 2012a, b). system (meaning) and the sensorimotor system (sound): in other words, interfaces are the loci for Minimalist parameters.…”
Section: Variation and Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…i.a. Dresher 2009Dresher , 2014 in the domain of phonology; Gianollo, Guardiano & Longobardi 2008;Longobardi 2017, andLongobardi 2018 for the proposal that specific parameters in fact reflect a limited number of innately specified parameter schema, and Rizzi 2014Rizzi , 2015 for a proposal in the same spirit; see also i.a. Zeijlstra 2008; Biberauer 2018 et seq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%