The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1987
DOI: 10.1137/0216010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Fast Algorithms for Four Problems in Stable Marriage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
192
0
5

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
192
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…each set in a preference list has size at most 2). If there are no ties, the problem of finding an egalitarian or minimum regret stable set is solvable in polynomial time [13,10]. Since all stable sets consist of n couples in the classical SMP, the G-S algorithm trivially finds a maximum (or minimum) cardinality [7].…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…each set in a preference list has size at most 2). If there are no ties, the problem of finding an egalitarian or minimum regret stable set is solvable in polynomial time [13,10]. Since all stable sets consist of n couples in the classical SMP, the G-S algorithm trivially finds a maximum (or minimum) cardinality [7].…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10,13,20]). In this paper, we propose to use Answer Set Programming (ASP) as a general vehicle for modeling a large class of extensions and variations of the SMP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable marriage problems with weighted preferences have been studied also in (Gusfield, 1987;Irving et al, 1987). However, they solve these problems by looking at the stable marriages that maximize the sum of the weights of the married pairs, where the weights depend on the specific criteria used to find an optimal solution, that can be minimum regret criterion (Gusfield, 1987), the egalitarian criterion (Irving et al, 1987) or the Lex criteria (Irving et al, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they solve these problems by looking at the stable marriages that maximize the sum of the weights of the married pairs, where the weights depend on the specific criteria used to find an optimal solution, that can be minimum regret criterion (Gusfield, 1987), the egalitarian criterion (Irving et al, 1987) or the Lex criteria (Irving et al, 1987). Therefore, they consider as stable the same marriages that are stable when we don't consider the weights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often it is beneficial to work with a stable matching that is fair to all agents in a precise sense [11,16]. One such fairness concept can be defined as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%