2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2004.00242.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three facts about marijuana prices*

Abstract: Australians are among the largest consumers of marijuana in the world, and estimates show that their expenditure on marijuana is approximately twice that on wine. In the present paper, the evolution of Australian marijuana prices over the last decade is analysed, and a decline in real terms by almost 40 per cent is shown. This decline is far above that experienced by most agricultural products. Why has this occurred and what are the implications? One possible reason is the adoption of hydroponic growing techni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In most studies on pricing mechanisms in drug markets or, more specifically, in local cannabis markets [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], analysis of pricing mechanisms is based on quantitative and qualitative data used or produced by the police and/or judicial authorities. However, the latter are often biased because: (i) police investigation methods can be based on stereotypes (certain types of suspects could be neglected since they do not match known types of suspects, whereby the former may use other pricing mechanisms than the stereotype suspects [18,[30][31][32][33][34]; (ii) changing priorities in public drug policies and in investigation by police result in unsystematically collected data [19,24,34]; (iii) information on drug prices in police data is mostly limited to the amount of drugs seized whereas the value of these drugs is always derived from interrogations of the arrested person [16] who often undervalues his crop to avoid higher sentences; (iv) police rarely takes the phenomenon of quantity discounting into account (i.e.…”
Section: Price Setting In the Belgian Cannabis Distribution Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most studies on pricing mechanisms in drug markets or, more specifically, in local cannabis markets [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], analysis of pricing mechanisms is based on quantitative and qualitative data used or produced by the police and/or judicial authorities. However, the latter are often biased because: (i) police investigation methods can be based on stereotypes (certain types of suspects could be neglected since they do not match known types of suspects, whereby the former may use other pricing mechanisms than the stereotype suspects [18,[30][31][32][33][34]; (ii) changing priorities in public drug policies and in investigation by police result in unsystematically collected data [19,24,34]; (iii) information on drug prices in police data is mostly limited to the amount of drugs seized whereas the value of these drugs is always derived from interrogations of the arrested person [16] who often undervalues his crop to avoid higher sentences; (iv) police rarely takes the phenomenon of quantity discounting into account (i.e.…”
Section: Price Setting In the Belgian Cannabis Distribution Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decline in the price of cannabis over the 1990s in Australia and the US provides a plausible explanation for why initiation is occurring at younger ages in these countries (Clements, 2004;Pacula et al, 2001). An alternative explanation is that cannabis use has become more socially acceptable over this period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Issues relating to marijuana consumption are, to some extent, different from those of legal drugs. Although still an illicit drug in Australia, the consumption of marijuana among a significant proportion of Australians has persevered and the real price of marijuana has declined by almost 40 per cent over the past decade (Clements, 2004). The trend towards hydroponic cultivation has significantly increased productivity and product quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%