“…In most studies on pricing mechanisms in drug markets or, more specifically, in local cannabis markets [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], analysis of pricing mechanisms is based on quantitative and qualitative data used or produced by the police and/or judicial authorities. However, the latter are often biased because: (i) police investigation methods can be based on stereotypes (certain types of suspects could be neglected since they do not match known types of suspects, whereby the former may use other pricing mechanisms than the stereotype suspects [18,[30][31][32][33][34]; (ii) changing priorities in public drug policies and in investigation by police result in unsystematically collected data [19,24,34]; (iii) information on drug prices in police data is mostly limited to the amount of drugs seized whereas the value of these drugs is always derived from interrogations of the arrested person [16] who often undervalues his crop to avoid higher sentences; (iv) police rarely takes the phenomenon of quantity discounting into account (i.e.…”