Three Es of linked injury data: Episodes, Encounters and Events

Abstract

BackgroundTreatment and recovery times following injury can be lengthy, comprising multiple interactions with the hospital system for initial acute care, subsequent rehabilitation and possible re-presentation due to complications.AimsThis article aims to promote the use of consistent terminology in injury data linkage studies, suggest important factors to consider when managing linked injury data, and encourage thorough documentation and a robust discourse around different approaches to data management to ensure reproducibility, consistency and comparability of analyses arising from linked injury data.ApproachThis paper is presented in sections describing: (1) considerations for identifying injury cohorts, (2) considerations for grouping Episodes into Encounters and (3) considerations for grouping Encounters into Events. Summary tools are provided to aid researchers in the management of linked injury data.DiscussionCareful consideration of decisions made when identifying injury cohorts and grouping data into units of analysis (Episodes/Encounters/Events) is essential when using linked injury data. Choices made have the potential to significantly impact the epidemiological and clinical findings derived from linked injury data studies, which ultimately affect the quality of injury prevention initiatives and injury management policy and practice. It is intended that this paper will act as a call to action for injury linkage methodologists, and those using linked data, to critique approaches, share tools and engage in a robust discourse to further advance the use of linked injury data, and ultimately enhance the value of linked injury data for clinicians and health and social policymakers.

A population-based epidemiological and health economic analysis of fracture-related infection

“…All acute care hospitalization episodes for each patient were grouped into encounters to reproducibly organize the linked dataset. 18 Episodes are largely analogous to episodes in the UK system, and encounters (groups of episodes) are analogous to spells in the UK when they occur in a single facility; however, for our study we use encounters more broadly to include all facilities which the patient moved through in the single healthcare experience, i.e. initial referring hospital and definitive care hospital are included in the one encounter if the patient experienced the care in a continuous block.…”

Understanding compensable and non-compensable patient profiles, pathways and physical outcomes for transport and work-related injuries in Queensland, Australia through data linkage

“…This protocol uses the terminology described in Vallmuur and colleagues’ paper, 33 a study which aimed to promote the use of consistent terminology in injury data linkage studies to describe episodes, encounters and events, which in summary states:…”

Community Opioid Dispensing After Injury (CODI): Protocol for a Population-Based Data Linkage Study

“…It is possible for an individual to have multiple related or unrelated hospital admissions over the study period, so data sequencing logic is needed to distinguish records as (1) part of the same hospitalization (eg, a transfer); (2) a readmission or follow-up care related to the original index injury; (3) a new injury; or (4) a hospital admission for a reason other than injury. The study will apply data sequencing principles, logic, and definitions developed by Vallmuur et al [ 18 ], who use coded diagnoses, external causes, admission and discharge dates, transfer, and care type codes to distinguish between these records.…”