2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8nr05362f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three dimensionally-ordered 2D MoS2vertical layers integrated on flexible substrates with stretch-tunable functionality and improved sensing capability

Abstract: The intrinsically anisotropic crystallinity of two-dimensional (2D) transition metal dichalcogenide (2D TMD) layers enables a variety of intriguing material properties which strongly depend on the physical orientation of constituent 2D layers. For instance, 2D TMDs with vertically-aligned layers exhibit numerous dangling bonds on their 2D layer edge sites predominantly exposed on the surface, projecting significantly improved physical and/or chemical adsorption capability compared to their horizontally-oriente… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work of adhesion, W, required for the spontaneous 2D layer separation is expressed as , where γ SW , γ WL , and γ SL are interfacial tension between substrate and water, water and 2D layer, substrate and 2D layer, respectively. In comparing the 2D MoS 2 layers of horizontal vs. vertical orientation, we note that vertically-aligned 2D MoS 2 layers exhibit significantly higher adhesion energy with respect to the SiO 2 surface owing to the exposure of energetically reactive 2D edge sites; i.e., order-of-magnitude higher binding energy of 2D edges with dangling bonds over 2D basal panes with saturated bonds 55,56 . Accordingly, the value of γ SL for vertically-aligned 2D MoS 2 layers should be much smaller than that for horizontally-aligned ones, which further justifies the observed difficulty with their spontaneous separation inside water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The work of adhesion, W, required for the spontaneous 2D layer separation is expressed as , where γ SW , γ WL , and γ SL are interfacial tension between substrate and water, water and 2D layer, substrate and 2D layer, respectively. In comparing the 2D MoS 2 layers of horizontal vs. vertical orientation, we note that vertically-aligned 2D MoS 2 layers exhibit significantly higher adhesion energy with respect to the SiO 2 surface owing to the exposure of energetically reactive 2D edge sites; i.e., order-of-magnitude higher binding energy of 2D edges with dangling bonds over 2D basal panes with saturated bonds 55,56 . Accordingly, the value of γ SL for vertically-aligned 2D MoS 2 layers should be much smaller than that for horizontally-aligned ones, which further justifies the observed difficulty with their spontaneous separation inside water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The as‐prepared humidity sensor shows an extremely high moisture sensitivity ( R dry / R humid ) up to 2357 (for 90% RH), which outperforms the existing stretchable humidity sensors. [ 722–726 ] The sensor can withstand up to 40% tensile strain without apparent performance degradation. In addition, the sensor exhibits reliable signals under dynamic RH changing when a saturated water moisture gas is periodically introduced.…”
Section: D Materials‐based Wearable Sensors For Human Health Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the shapes of the UV-vis spectral profiles are consistent with previous observations with thickness-varying 2D MoS2 layers integrated on other optically transparent substrates. [43][44][45][46] Detailed optical characteristics of the integrated 2D MoS2 layers were further analysed by developing Tauc plots from the UV-vis spectra, 47,48 as shown in Fig. 2d.…”
Section: Please Do Not Adjust Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%