2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Workstation is Useful for Measuring the Correct Size of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Diameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Centerline reconstructed images were found to have more accuracy and reproducibility in detecting abdominal aortic aneurysm, and are now endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology for detecting aortic disease [39][40][41]. Accordingly, using a centerline-based image reconstructive technique, we obtained accurate cross-sectional pan-aortic images non-invasively.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Non-invasive Plaque Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Centerline reconstructed images were found to have more accuracy and reproducibility in detecting abdominal aortic aneurysm, and are now endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology for detecting aortic disease [39][40][41]. Accordingly, using a centerline-based image reconstructive technique, we obtained accurate cross-sectional pan-aortic images non-invasively.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Non-invasive Plaque Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…EVAR, endovascular aneurysm repair; SMA, superior mesenteric artery. cdt.amegroups.com S164 evaluation results in greater inter and intra-observer variability from reproducibility and objectivity which is heavily influenced by vessel tortuosity on axial 2D images (49,50). Sobocinski et al demonstrated that the proper utilization of a 3D workstation resulted in less type I endoleaks and secondary interventions when compared to preprocedure imaging evaluation solely by axial 2D CTA (48).…”
Section: Image Processing Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of aortic diameter by CTA is generally recommended with three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed images whenever possible; the maximum diameter is measured perpendicular to the centerline of the vessels on the curved multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) images [1,3]. In situations where 3D and MPR imaging are unavailable, the minor axis (smaller diamcc This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.…”
Section: Normal Aorta and Aortic Aneurysm Normal Anatomy Of The Thoramentioning
confidence: 99%