2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Vertebral Wedging in Mild and Moderate Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Abstract: BackgroundVertebral wedging is associated with spinal deformity progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Reporting frontal and sagittal wedging separately could be misleading since these are projected values of a single three-dimensional deformation of the vertebral body. The objectives of this study were to determine if three-dimensional vertebral body wedging is present in mild scoliosis and if there are a preferential vertebral level, position and plane of deformation with increasing scoliotic severi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3D angular error was determined by the mean absolute difference between 16 measured and reconstructed angles. The mean error on the wedging angles was estimated at 0.1 61.0 [15]. These values are comparable with those reported by Ill es and Somoske€ oy [39] when using the EOS reconstruction software system.…”
Section: Spine and Pelvis 3d Reconstructionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The 3D angular error was determined by the mean absolute difference between 16 measured and reconstructed angles. The mean error on the wedging angles was estimated at 0.1 61.0 [15]. These values are comparable with those reported by Ill es and Somoske€ oy [39] when using the EOS reconstruction software system.…”
Section: Spine and Pelvis 3d Reconstructionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The 3D reconstruction errors were estimated from 26 fiducial marks fixed to a calibration object to cover a volume of 210 by 210 by 410 mm. The mean absolute difference between the measured and calculated 3D coordinates was 1.3560.79 mm [15]. The 3D angular error was determined by the mean absolute difference between 16 measured and reconstructed angles.…”
Section: Spine and Pelvis 3d Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, few studies document the scoliotic spine wedging in the frontal and sagittal planes at the same time. These studies are limited to cadaveric spine specimens, and none of them focus on the population affected by Schëuermanń s kyphosis [38,39].…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%