Three-Dimensional Vertebral Motions Produced by Mechanical Force Spinal Manipulation

Keller, Tony S.; Colloca, Christopher J.; Moore, Robert J.; Gunzburg, Robert; Harrison, Deed E.; Harrison, Donald D.

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.06.012

Cited by 30 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 32 publications

(55 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…21 However, the direction of coupled motion agrees with previous studies demonstrating heterolateral AR combined with LB. 19,20 Numerous studies have investigated biomechanical responses for the impulse phase during instrumented or manual manipulation procedure, 15,55 but only few data are available concerning motion analysis during the impulse period (BC, Fig 4) of cervical manipulative procedures. 20,21 These studies showed that LB and AR displacements and AR/LB ratio might be influenced by the practitioner or the technique.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Head-Trunk Kinematics During High-Velocity–Low-Amplitude Manipulation of the Cervical Spine in Asymptomatic Subjects: Helical Axis Computation and Anatomic Motion Modeling

Dugailly

Sobczak

Geyt

et al. 2015

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Head-Trunk Kinematics During High-Velocity–Low-Amplitude Manipulation of the Cervical Spine in Asymptomatic Subjects: Helical Axis Computation and Anatomic Motion Modeling

Dugailly

Sobczak

Geyt

et al. 2015

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Although not yet applied to SMT input kinematics, accelerometers have been used to objectively measure the resultant spinal kinematics, although most of these studies are based on animal models (Gal et al, 1995;Maigne & Guillon, 2000;Keller et al, 2003;Colloca et al, 2003;Colloca et al, 2006;Keller et al, 2006b;Colloca et al, 2007;Gal et al, 1997a).…”

Section: Hand Kinematicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The mechanical characteristics of three commonly used chiropractic manipulation instruments (Activator IV, CAT, and Impulse) were quantified and compared in Merino sheep (Keller et al, 2006b). Accelerometers were attached to interosseous pins embedded in the spinous process of L1 and L2 of the animals.…”

Section: Hand Kinematicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…force) or the body's response to such an input (eg. vertebral displacement) Kirstukas & Backman, 1999;Keller et al, 2006b;Keller et al, 2006a;Colloca et al, 2006;Triano, 2001;Solinger, 2000;Keller & Colloca, 2002;Sung et al, 2005;Dishman et al, 2005;Pickar & Kang, 2006;Pickar et al, 2007;). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Spinal manipulation is described as a high velocity/low amplitude thrust utilizing manual manipulative (Triano, 2001;Symons et al, 2002;Herzog et al, 2001;Kawchuk et al, 2006) and mechanically-assisted or instrument-assisted techniques (Keller & Colloca, 2002;Keller et al, 2003;Colloca et al, 2006;Keller et al, 2006b;Keller et al, 2006a;Colloca et al, 2007). Surprisingly, the parameters of high velocity and low amplitude have never been directly measured with respect to the manipulative input.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Acceleration of clinician hand movements during spinal manipulative therapy

Gelley¹,

Passmore

MacNeil

2015

Manual Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The primary objective of this study was to determine the acceleration characteristics of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) and whether patient anthropometric parameters correlated with the SMT kinematic parameters. For this, a wireless tri-axial accelerometer was taped to the dorsum of a clinician's hand to record the accelerations generated during clinical treatment of 95 symptomatic patients. Peak acceleration magnitudes differed significantly between spinal levels (p<0.0001; lumbar > cervical > thoracic = sacroiliac). The latencies of these peaks were also significantly different (p<0.0001; lumbar < cervical = thoracic < sacroiliac). Within a given spinal level, acceleration amplitudes varied over a wide range with temporal parameters remaining relatively constant. Overall, anthropometric parameters were poorly correlated with SMT parameters. In summary, distinct acceleration amplitudes were observed across spinal levels with relatively constant temporal factors. Thus, clinicians appear to vary the magnitude rather than the duration of the SMT thrust.ii Acknowledgements

show abstract

The Place of Chiropractic Care in the Treatment of Low Back Pain

Colloca

2010

Surgery for Low Back Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three-Dimensional Vertebral Motions Produced by Mechanical Force Spinal Manipulation

Cited by 30 publications

References 32 publications

Head-Trunk Kinematics During High-Velocity–Low-Amplitude Manipulation of the Cervical Spine in Asymptomatic Subjects: Helical Axis Computation and Anatomic Motion Modeling

Head-Trunk Kinematics During High-Velocity–Low-Amplitude Manipulation of the Cervical Spine in Asymptomatic Subjects: Helical Axis Computation and Anatomic Motion Modeling

Acceleration of clinician hand movements during spinal manipulative therapy

The Place of Chiropractic Care in the Treatment of Low Back Pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About