2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009ja015070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three‐dimensional VERB radiation belt simulations including mixed diffusion

Abstract: [1] The evolution of relativistic electron fluxes in the radiation belts is described by the modified Fokker-Plank equation in terms of the radial distance, energy and equatorial pitch angle. In this study we present numerical solutions of the two-dimensional (2-D) and 3-D Fokker-Planck equation including mixed diffusion terms. We use finite differences method with implicit numerical scheme, which is stable for any given time step. We evaluate the importance of the mixed diffusion in 2-D and 3-D cases of the F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
120
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
120
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results indicate that during the small but representative storm events, the drift loss to the magnetopause (i.e, magnetopause shadowing) together with outward radial diffusion is mainly responsible for the electron loss, contributing approximately 93-99 % of the total loss near the geosynchronous orbit (L * > 5.0), but with the inner region (L * ≤ 5.0) requiring some additional loss mechanisms (only 60 % can be explained by the above coupled mechanism). Future studies will be directed to quantify relative contributions of other individual or mixed loss mechanisms, such as pitch angle and energy diffusions, which can be included within multidimensional models to represent wave-particle interactions (e.g., Beutier and Boscher, 1995;Albert et al, 2009;Su et al, 2010;Subbotin et al, 2010;Tu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results indicate that during the small but representative storm events, the drift loss to the magnetopause (i.e, magnetopause shadowing) together with outward radial diffusion is mainly responsible for the electron loss, contributing approximately 93-99 % of the total loss near the geosynchronous orbit (L * > 5.0), but with the inner region (L * ≤ 5.0) requiring some additional loss mechanisms (only 60 % can be explained by the above coupled mechanism). Future studies will be directed to quantify relative contributions of other individual or mixed loss mechanisms, such as pitch angle and energy diffusions, which can be included within multidimensional models to represent wave-particle interactions (e.g., Beutier and Boscher, 1995;Albert et al, 2009;Su et al, 2010;Subbotin et al, 2010;Tu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the other parameters, the wave normal angle information during the propagation of EMIC waves is difficult to acquire directly from in situ observations. Although EMIC waves are believed to become more and more oblique during their propagation to higher latitudes mainly due to the geomagnetic field gradient and curvature, previous studies have commonly adopted a parallel or quasi-parallel propagation assumption to determine the resonant scattering rates of EMIC waves [e.g., Summers and Thorne, 2003;Summers, 2005;Summers et al, 2007;Li et al, 2007;Ukhorskiy et al, 2010;Subbotin et al, 2010;Kersten et al, 2014;Ma et al, 2015]. The major purpose of this study is to evaluate the quantitative role of EMIC waves in driving scattering loss of outer radiation belt relativistic electrons and its sensitivity to wave normal angle distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Salammbo model (Beutier and Boscher, 1995) is an early example of such. More recent 3-D diffusion models now include cross-diffusion terms and have shown that such terms can be important to the evolution of the radiation belts (Xiao et al, 2010;Subbotin et al, 2010). The Dynamic Radiation Environment Assimilation Model (DREAM, Reeves et al, 2005) incorporates data assimilation to drive radial diffusion results towards more realistic values (Koller et al, 2007).…”
Section: T Welling Et Al: Radbelt Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%