2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13234928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Urban Land Cover Classification by Prior-Level Fusion of LiDAR Point Cloud and Optical Imagery

Abstract: The heterogeneity of urban landscape in the vertical direction should not be neglected in urban ecology research, which requires urban land cover product transformation from two-dimensions to three-dimensions using light detection and ranging system (LiDAR) point clouds. Previous studies have demonstrated that the performance of two-dimensional land cover classification can be improved by fusing optical imagery and LiDAR data using several strategies. However, few studies have focused on the fusion of LiDAR po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some examples of common semantic classes are taken; for example, in the case of the class buildings, higher accuracy was obtained compared to those obtained by [43] at the level of the built-up area class, with all tested techniques using the merged Eagle MNF Lidar datasets. Similarly, in the case of the class of cars, higher accuracy was achieved compared to the one obtained by [36] (71.4), which used the ISPRS dataset. Another example is the revealed confusion between the two semantic classes, buildings and vegetation, in [34], contrary to this work, in which the two semantic classes are well classified (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Some examples of common semantic classes are taken; for example, in the case of the class buildings, higher accuracy was obtained compared to those obtained by [43] at the level of the built-up area class, with all tested techniques using the merged Eagle MNF Lidar datasets. Similarly, in the case of the class of cars, higher accuracy was achieved compared to the one obtained by [36] (71.4), which used the ISPRS dataset. Another example is the revealed confusion between the two semantic classes, buildings and vegetation, in [34], contrary to this work, in which the two semantic classes are well classified (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Scientific research is more oriented to the use of several spatial data attributes (X, Y, Z, red, green, blue, near-infrared, etc.) [34,36,42,43] by developing fusion-based approaches for semantic segmentation. These last ones have shown good performance in terms of precision, efficiency, and robustness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among them, ref. [16] proposed a fusion approach of images and LiDAR PCs for semantic segmentation. The proposed approach was compared with point-level, feature-level, and decision-level fusion approaches.…”
Section: Prior-level Fusion Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%