2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mprp.2017.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three dimensional surface topography characterization of the electron beam melted Ti6Al4V

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can only be explained by the different angle of impact of the laser beam on the powder bed in the center and corners of the build platform. The measured roughness values correspond to the values found by Sidambe [35], although he uses the spatial parameters (Sa) instead of profile parameters (Ra), and correspond also to the values The measured roughness values correspond to the values found by Sidambe [35], although he uses the spatial parameters (Sa) instead of profile parameters (Ra), and correspond also to the values given in [1]. Sidambe also notes that horizontally oriented surfaces have lower roughness values than inclined surfaces.…”
Section: Roughness Of Materialssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This can only be explained by the different angle of impact of the laser beam on the powder bed in the center and corners of the build platform. The measured roughness values correspond to the values found by Sidambe [35], although he uses the spatial parameters (Sa) instead of profile parameters (Ra), and correspond also to the values The measured roughness values correspond to the values found by Sidambe [35], although he uses the spatial parameters (Sa) instead of profile parameters (Ra), and correspond also to the values given in [1]. Sidambe also notes that horizontally oriented surfaces have lower roughness values than inclined surfaces.…”
Section: Roughness Of Materialssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It is revealed that the surface roughness of EBM-built sample can be varied by modifying the processing parameters. The lowest surface roughness is ~20 µm, compared to the highest surface roughness is ~40 µm, which differs from the previous reports by using an earlier version of EBM system, S12 [ 23 , 29 ]. Two optimized processing parameters are N5 and N6, as listed in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Due to the nature of the EBM building process, the as-built parts have relatively rough surfaces as compared to those conventionally machined surfaces [ 4 , 5 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. The EBM part’s rough surface reduces the effective cross section [ 24 , 26 ], which changes the mechanical response [ 3 , 27 ] and results in premature failure of the part [ 24 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many authors in the research are focused on the effects of Ti6Al4V processing technology on its mechanical, fatigue properties, surface quality after machining, and so on [20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. In particular, the influence of the building direction in additive technologies is observed.…”
Section: Research Activities Related To Dmls/slm Of Ti6al4vmentioning
confidence: 99%