2006
DOI: 10.1086/506981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three‐dimensional Structure of the 2002 April 21 Coronal Mass Ejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…UVCS has observed this line typically at heliocentric distances ranging between $1.5 and 1.7 R , and it is not always easy to understand from observations in different events if the altitude of the UVCS projected field of view was either below the cusp of closed loops, or above it in the DR, or maybe even above the DR. In any case, there is a general consensus that [ Fe xviii] emission originates above the cusp of post-CME loops probably in the DR, as indirectly concluded by previous authors from considerations on many observational parameters such as elemental abundances and emission measure , plasma cooling rate and post-CME loops rising speed (Bemporad et al 2006), 3D reconstruction of CME material expansion (Lee et al 2006), and outflowing mass flux conservation (Ciaravella & Raymond 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…UVCS has observed this line typically at heliocentric distances ranging between $1.5 and 1.7 R , and it is not always easy to understand from observations in different events if the altitude of the UVCS projected field of view was either below the cusp of closed loops, or above it in the DR, or maybe even above the DR. In any case, there is a general consensus that [ Fe xviii] emission originates above the cusp of post-CME loops probably in the DR, as indirectly concluded by previous authors from considerations on many observational parameters such as elemental abundances and emission measure , plasma cooling rate and post-CME loops rising speed (Bemporad et al 2006), 3D reconstruction of CME material expansion (Lee et al 2006), and outflowing mass flux conservation (Ciaravella & Raymond 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…As mentioned above, observations of the [Fe xviii] line in post-CME CSs reported so far (Ciaravella et al 2002;Ko et al 2003;Raymond et al 2003;Bemporad et al 2006;Lee et al 2006;Ciaravella & Raymond 2008) show a strong line emission, but observational periods typically do not exceed a few hours, making it difficult to perform a complete study on the evolution of the line profile from each single data set. The only UVCS data set published so far in which the [ Fe xviii] line has been observed continuously for days after the CME is the one we reported in Paper I; these unique observations covered a period of $2.3 days (starting $1.5 hr after the CME) and were characterized by a strong [Fe xviii] emission detected during the whole time interval over a broad spatial region covering approximately $7 0 along the spectrometer slit (see Paper I, Figs.…”
Section: Fe XVIII Kinetic Temperatures In Cssmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the temperature and density range of XPE plasmas can be sampled by other spectroscopic instrumentation which allow broader diagnostic possibilities, although detection and identification of such plasmas are difficult with a spectrometer alone. Lee et al (2006) identified a localized region of hot plasma seen in the Fe xviii forbidden line at 974 Å with UVCS during a CME on 2002 April 21. It appeared to trail the CME core, and the Fe xviii line indicated a temperature of around 6 × 10 6 K. Lee et al (2006) found that the plasma was probably situated near the top of the current sheet, but they could not determine whether it was heated by reconnection or by a shock where the reconnection exhaust encountered the CME core.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%