2012
DOI: 10.1107/s0907444912008372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional structure of a schistosome serpin revealing an unusual configuration of the helical subdomain

Abstract: Parasitic organisms are constantly challenged by the defence mechanisms of their respective hosts, which often depend on serine protease activities. Consequently, protease inhibitors such as those belonging to the serpin superfamily have emerged as protective elements that support the survival of the parasites. This report describes the crystal structure of ShSPI, a serpin from the trematode Schistosoma haematobium. The protein is exposed on the surface of invading cercaria as well as of adult worms, suggestin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of the PMSRP1 model with the templates revealed a highly conserved structure at both secondary (three β-sheets and nine α-helices) and three-dimensional levels (RMSD = 1.34 and 0.49 Å, serpin B3 and T. molitor serpin, respectively) (Figures 4 and 6 ). The conservation of the core of the structure reinforced the hypothesis of some authors that the serpin scaffold is intolerant to the deletion of all but peripheral elements of secondary structure [ 61 , 62 ]. Thus changes in non-conserved residues that allowed the folding of the serpin into an active native state were favored by the selective pressure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison of the PMSRP1 model with the templates revealed a highly conserved structure at both secondary (three β-sheets and nine α-helices) and three-dimensional levels (RMSD = 1.34 and 0.49 Å, serpin B3 and T. molitor serpin, respectively) (Figures 4 and 6 ). The conservation of the core of the structure reinforced the hypothesis of some authors that the serpin scaffold is intolerant to the deletion of all but peripheral elements of secondary structure [ 61 , 62 ]. Thus changes in non-conserved residues that allowed the folding of the serpin into an active native state were favored by the selective pressure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…gambiae (XP_314158) and a slightly lower of 37.8% and 37.4% with the sequences of L. longipalpis (ABV60345) and C. felis (AAN73325), respectively (Figure 4 ). Despite this level of identity, the theoretical prediction of the serpin secondary structure pointed to the conservation of nine α-helices and three β-sheets, similar to other serpin family members [ 61 , 62 ] (Figure 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data were processed with XIA2/DIALS and assigned to the spacegroup P 3 2 2 1 with a unit cell of a = b = 98.9, c = 115.3 Å, α = β = 90°, γ = 120° [ 23 ]. The structure was solved by molecular replacement using MOLREP [ 24 ] from the CCP4i2 suite, and the structural homolog from Schistosoma haematobium (PDB: 3STO [ 25 ]) with whom it shares 76% sequence identity, as a search model. The model was further manually inspected and built using Coot [ 26 ] and refined using PHENIX.refine [ 27 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%