1993
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.161.4.8372741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional sonographic reconstruction: techniques and diagnostic applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MRI (Roberts, 1995 ;Thorpe et al 1998) and 3D ultrasound (Rankin et al 1993 ;Fenster & Downey, 2000) studies may well provide such internal structural data in the living, in the future.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI (Roberts, 1995 ;Thorpe et al 1998) and 3D ultrasound (Rankin et al 1993 ;Fenster & Downey, 2000) studies may well provide such internal structural data in the living, in the future.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is currently limited more by processing than acoustics, which is the ultimate limit. High rates of acquisition (between 10-60 images per second) [152] can allow imaging within a single breath hold, greatly increasing modelling accuracy in organs which move with inspiration and expiration. This also allows the study of organ motion itself; much of the development of 3D ultrasound has been targeted towards such studies of the heart.…”
Section: Why 3d Ultrasound?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The reconstruction of 3D ultrasound by computer brings greater standardisation and repeatability to conventional examinations [152], which are otherwise quite subjective [57]. It may provide a better point of reference for discussing diagnosis than a conventional 2D hard copy.…”
Section: Why 3d Ultrasound?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional freehand 3D ultrasound is a multi-stage process [1,2,3]. First, the clinician scans the anatomical organ of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%