2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.06.268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional Simulation of Magnetic Flux Dynamics and Temperature Rise in HTSC Bulk during Pulsed Field Magnetization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the field increases, it saturates around 50 K, reaching a maximum of 1.41 T at 10 K. This strong saturation behaviour is due to thermal instability in the bulk at lower temperatures around 20 K. Because the J c is so high at these low temperatures, any attempt to penetrate flux a significant depth into the sample will result in larger heat dissipation than at higher temperatures. The inhomogeneous J c of a bulk leads hot spots [1] during this excessive heat linked to asymmetric flux penetration which causes a large rise in temperature, even enough to cause a sudden loss of all trapped flux if too high a field is applied. This is why the field profiles in figure 3(b) for the tape stacks are saturated with a conical profile, but the bulk trapped field is broad and has a flatter peak.…”
Section: Stack Of Tapes and Bulk Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the field increases, it saturates around 50 K, reaching a maximum of 1.41 T at 10 K. This strong saturation behaviour is due to thermal instability in the bulk at lower temperatures around 20 K. Because the J c is so high at these low temperatures, any attempt to penetrate flux a significant depth into the sample will result in larger heat dissipation than at higher temperatures. The inhomogeneous J c of a bulk leads hot spots [1] during this excessive heat linked to asymmetric flux penetration which causes a large rise in temperature, even enough to cause a sudden loss of all trapped flux if too high a field is applied. This is why the field profiles in figure 3(b) for the tape stacks are saturated with a conical profile, but the bulk trapped field is broad and has a flatter peak.…”
Section: Stack Of Tapes and Bulk Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However when experiencing a pulsed field, bulks suffer from thermal instability below 77 K resulting from inhomogeneous critical current density. The J c is around 4 times higher in the growth sector boundary of a bulk compared to the growth sector regions leading to hotspots during magnetization [1]. A stack of coated conductors has relatively uniform J c both radially and axially and so does not suffer from this thermal instability when pulse magnetized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ohsaki et al investigated the magnetic flux motion in bulk superconductor during PFM using the given angled or cos curve model [21,22]. To understand the magnetic flux dynamics mechanism and temperature rise in the bulk superconductor, the simulation was performed by assuming that the critical current density in the GSBs was four times higher than that in the GSRs [23]. Recently, Ainslie et al also studied the inhomogeneity of the bulk superconductor under the magnetization process of PFM and FC, and the mechanical response of the bulk superconductor under field cooling was also analyzed [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our studies in the past have revealed that the amount of residual trapped-field due to the preceding operation strongly affects the flux motion in the next operation and, hence, the amount of resulting trapped-field [13]. As a second approach we can improve the trapping ability by refining the material design such as the shape of the bulk [14], the introduction of artificial defects or holes [15,16], macroscopic J c distribution and so on. It is also evident that penetrating quantized fluxes are strongly affected by the local J c due to the presence of non-superconducting Y 2 BaCuO 5 (Y211) particles [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%