The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Similarity in Molecular Docking: Prioritizing Ligand Poses on the Basis of Experimental Binding Modes

Abstract: Molecular docking is the premier approach to structure-based virtual screening. While ligand posing is often successful, compound ranking using force field-based scoring functions remains difficult. Uncertainties associated with scoring often limit the ability to confidently identify new active compounds. In this study, we introduce an alternative approach to compound ranking. Rather than using scoring functions for final ranking, compounds are prioritized on the basis of computed 3D similarity to known crysta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this approach better enrichments were found, around 10% better (AUC of 0.7 for docking vs 0.8 for 3D similarity) than scoring rankings (Anighoro & Bajorath, 2016).…”
Section: Pose Vs Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this approach better enrichments were found, around 10% better (AUC of 0.7 for docking vs 0.8 for 3D similarity) than scoring rankings (Anighoro & Bajorath, 2016).…”
Section: Pose Vs Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim is to identify the compounds, which interact favorably with the target binding site [32]. Meanwhile, LBVS methods utilize chemical similarity analysis of structurally diverse or known active ligands, with the view of identifying novel small molecules, which could show similar biological activities [33][34][35]. However, both approaches have practical limitations.…”
Section: Computational Approaches In Drug Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the limited number of high-quality 3D structures of proteins and the structural complexity of natural products (e.g., multiple chiral atoms) restrict the application of current molecular docking and ligand 3D shape similarity approaches. 14 In addition, most of machine learning approaches (except for k-nearest neighbor) require negative samples, while lack of high-quality negative samples further limit the accuracy of current machine learning-based models. 6,15 It is urgently needed to develop new computational approaches for exploring the space of drug targets for natural products at the human proteome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%