2008
DOI: 10.1785/0120080175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Seismic Attenuation Structure around the SAFOD Site, Parkfield, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculated values for coseismic changes in attenuation, ()Δ+11Q0, along each ray path, are given in Table and are of the order of 1.0 × 10 − 3 . Previous studies of time‐averaged attenuation in the Parkfield area report a P‐wave Quality factor, Q p of approximately 100–200, with lower values of 10–80 within the fault zone itself [ Abercrombie , ; Bennington et al ., ]. Given these time‐averaged Q p values, simple calculations suggest that an increase in ()Δ+11Q0 of 1.0 × 10 − 3 corresponds to a decrease in Q p of the order of 10%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculated values for coseismic changes in attenuation, ()Δ+11Q0, along each ray path, are given in Table and are of the order of 1.0 × 10 − 3 . Previous studies of time‐averaged attenuation in the Parkfield area report a P‐wave Quality factor, Q p of approximately 100–200, with lower values of 10–80 within the fault zone itself [ Abercrombie , ; Bennington et al ., ]. Given these time‐averaged Q p values, simple calculations suggest that an increase in ()Δ+11Q0 of 1.0 × 10 − 3 corresponds to a decrease in Q p of the order of 10%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the site effect parameter, S j , is usually ignored [e.g., Lees and Lindley , ; Eberhart‐Phillips and Chadwick , ], we use a joint inversion method developed by Bennington et al . [] and modified by Pesicek et al . [] that iteratively inverts the observed spectra for Ωoij, the corner frequency fic of each earthquake, the site response S j for each station, and tij* by using the Levenberg‐Marquardt method [e.g., Aster et al ., ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here a path attenuation ( t *) estimation technique that accounts for site response [ Pesicek et al ., ], modified from Bennington et al . [], is used to analyze P waves from local earthquakes in the NMSZ. The events were recorded by the Cooperative New Madrid Seismic Network (CNMSN) and the PANDA network (Figure ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geophysical properties of the crust around the Parkfield region and at the SAFOD site have been characterized by a number of previous studies, including studies of seismic velocity [ Lees and Malin , 1990; Ben‐Zion and Malin , 1991; Michelini and McEvilly , 1991; Eberhart‐Phillips and Michael , 1993; Thurber et al , 2003, 2004; Roecker et al , 2004, 2006; Zhang and Thurber , 2005; Hole et al , 2006; Malin et al , 2006; Bleibinhaus et al , 2007], seismic attenuation [ Abercrombie , 2000; Bennington et al , 2008], seismic anisotropy [ Boness and Zoback , 2006; Zhang et al , 2007; Liu et al , 2008], electrical resistivity [ Unsworth et al , 1997, 2000; Unsworth and Bedrosian , 2004; Becken et al , 2008], and potential fields [ McPhee et al , 2004]. All the seismic velocity studies reported a velocity contrast across the SAF, faster to the southwest and slower to the northeast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%