2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 1 2010
DOI: 10.1115/ipc2010-31516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Response of Buried Pipelines Subjected to Large Soil Deformation Effects: Part I—3D Continuum Modeling Using ALE and SPH Formulations

Abstract: Understanding the effect of soil-pipeline interactions in the event of large ground movement is an important consideration for the pipeline designer. Both experimental investigation and computational analyses play significant roles in soil-pipeline research. As part of this effort, a framework incorporating continuum soil mechanics and advanced finite element approach (i.e., ALE and SPH method) for modeling soil pipe interaction was constructed. The overall objective of this work is to develop, validate and ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The operator-split ALE involves two stages: (a) Lagrangian step, where the governing equations for the saturated soil, the equilibrium equation and the continuity equation are solved by the traditional, updated Lagrangian method, and (b) the Eulerian step, which involves mesh smoothing and transfer of state variables. Many researchers have applied the ALE technique to solve geotechnical problems, which involve large deformations, such as a rough footing on an undrained soil layer (Nazem et al, 2009), consolidation problem (Nazem et al, 2008) and soilpipeline interactions (Fredj & Dinovitzer, 2010). Kardani et al (2011) implemented a refined h-adaptive finite-element technique in ALE to improve the numerical accuracy by continuously refining the mesh in the zone of concern.…”
Section: Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operator-split ALE involves two stages: (a) Lagrangian step, where the governing equations for the saturated soil, the equilibrium equation and the continuity equation are solved by the traditional, updated Lagrangian method, and (b) the Eulerian step, which involves mesh smoothing and transfer of state variables. Many researchers have applied the ALE technique to solve geotechnical problems, which involve large deformations, such as a rough footing on an undrained soil layer (Nazem et al, 2009), consolidation problem (Nazem et al, 2008) and soilpipeline interactions (Fredj & Dinovitzer, 2010). Kardani et al (2011) implemented a refined h-adaptive finite-element technique in ALE to improve the numerical accuracy by continuously refining the mesh in the zone of concern.…”
Section: Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for dynamic problems, the efficiency of the RITSS approach was reduced somewhat by the need for sufficiently small steps, comparable to those in CEL, thus negating the benefit of the implicit calculation approach. Other methods, e.g., the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) [41][42][43], Material Point Method (MPM) [44,45], and Particle Finite Element Method (PFEM) [46,47], fall in the latter category.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%