2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional reconstruction of the lower limb from biplanar calibrated radiographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a model-based 3D reconstruction technique using 2D calibrated low-dose biplane X-ray images has been proposed and validated for the spine (Pomero et al, 2004), thorax cage (Aubert et al, 2014), upper limb (Lebailly et al, 2012) and lower limb Quijano et al, 2013) and has been adapted to the shoulder (Lagacé et al, , 2010Ohl et al, 2015). The scapula model is generated a priori from cadaveric bone structures, therefore, the reconstruction and registration are achieved without using additional imagery acquisitions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a model-based 3D reconstruction technique using 2D calibrated low-dose biplane X-ray images has been proposed and validated for the spine (Pomero et al, 2004), thorax cage (Aubert et al, 2014), upper limb (Lebailly et al, 2012) and lower limb Quijano et al, 2013) and has been adapted to the shoulder (Lagacé et al, , 2010Ohl et al, 2015). The scapula model is generated a priori from cadaveric bone structures, therefore, the reconstruction and registration are achieved without using additional imagery acquisitions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to other existing works on 2D/3D femur and tibia reconstruction, the presented surface reconstruction errors are considerably lower. While Messmer et al [12] achieved average errors of 1.5 ± 0.70 mm for the tibial shaft, 2.2 ± 0.79 mm for the tibial plateau and 2.4 ± 0.82 mm for the plafond area, Quijano et al [15] reported a mean reconstruction error of 1.3 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, 2D/3D reconstruction methods based on statistical shape models (SSMs) could be a valuable alternative. Methods for 2D/3D reconstruction of the femur and tibia from X-ray radiographs were presented by Messmer et al [12], Gunay et al [13], Gamage et al [14] and Quijano et al [15]. All approaches perform a 3D reconstruction of the intact bone and are therefore not directly applicable to the reconstruction of a fractured bone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for using these methods the requirements of the application must be considered. Different parametric algorithms have been proposed for 3D reconstruction of various bony structures such as Baudoin et al (2008) for 3D reconstruction of the proximal femur, Quijano et al (2013) and Chaibi et al (2011) Kadoury's method (2009Kadoury's method ( , 2015 is a sample of these methods for 3D reconstruction of spine. They used a large database.…”
Section: Parametric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EOS is commercialized by the French company EOS imaging for orthopaedic applications. Nowadays in many developed countries EOS imaging system is applied in several hospitals and many researchers have used this system for 3D reconstruction of diverse bone structures such as Mitton et al (2006) for Pelvis, Baudoin et al (2008), Chaibi et al (2011), andQuijano et al (2013) for Lower Limb, Lebailly et al (2012) for Upper Limb, Aubert et al (2014) for Rib cage, Humbert et al (2009) and Rehm et al (2017) for Spine. However, this system is still unavailable in many developing countries and medical centres because of some restrictions such as costs.…”
Section: Perspective Model Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%