2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-4086-3_134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three Dimensional Reconstruction and Airflow Simulation in a Realistic Model of the Human Respiratory Airways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluid simulation analysis for patient one ( Figure 4 ) revealed the effect of different degrees of stenosis on the pressure distribution in and around the patch area. The pressure distribution under normal morphology was uniform, and the pressure on the medial side of the tracheal wall was between −4 and 2 Pa, which is consistent with the study of Ruiz ( Ruiz and Aristizabal, 2017 ). However, the pressure on the trachea with 33% stenosis ranged from −1–7 Pa, and the minimum value was found near the wall, where the pressure was −7.5 Pa. A lower pressure was observed on the trachea with 50% stenosis, ranging from −1 to −10 Pa, and the lowest pressure was −10.7 Pa near the wall.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The fluid simulation analysis for patient one ( Figure 4 ) revealed the effect of different degrees of stenosis on the pressure distribution in and around the patch area. The pressure distribution under normal morphology was uniform, and the pressure on the medial side of the tracheal wall was between −4 and 2 Pa, which is consistent with the study of Ruiz ( Ruiz and Aristizabal, 2017 ). However, the pressure on the trachea with 33% stenosis ranged from −1–7 Pa, and the minimum value was found near the wall, where the pressure was −7.5 Pa. A lower pressure was observed on the trachea with 50% stenosis, ranging from −1 to −10 Pa, and the lowest pressure was −10.7 Pa near the wall.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%