2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional radiative transfer in clumped hot star winds

Abstract: Context. The true mass-loss rates from massive stars are important for many branches of astrophysics. For the correct modeling of the resonance lines, which are among the key diagnostics of stellar mass-loss, the stellar wind clumping has been found to be very important. To incorporate clumping into a radiative transfer calculation, three-dimensional (3D) models are required. Various properties of the clumps may have a strong impact on the resonance line formation and, therefore, on the determination of empiri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 compare line profiles computed using this vmSEI approach with profiles computed using the standard SEI model, for intermediate and strong lines with κ 0 = 1 and 100. The figure shows clearly the basic velocity-porosity effect, namely weaker line-profiles for a given line-strength parameter κ 0 , consistent with all previous work on the effects of optically thick clumps on UV wind lines (Oskinova et al 2007;Sundqvist et al 2010Sundqvist et al , 2011Šurlan et al 2012.…”
Section: A Vorosity-modified Sei Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 compare line profiles computed using this vmSEI approach with profiles computed using the standard SEI model, for intermediate and strong lines with κ 0 = 1 and 100. The figure shows clearly the basic velocity-porosity effect, namely weaker line-profiles for a given line-strength parameter κ 0 , consistent with all previous work on the effects of optically thick clumps on UV wind lines (Oskinova et al 2007;Sundqvist et al 2010Sundqvist et al , 2011Šurlan et al 2012.…”
Section: A Vorosity-modified Sei Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This excess is caused by photon trapping within the resonance zones and by increased back-scattering due to multiple such resonance zones (Lucy 1984;Puls et al 1993;Sundqvist et al 2010), which allows light to escape primarily when emitted on the red side of the line profile; such multi-scattering effects cannot be simulated within the simple effective opacity method developed in this paper, but does not affect the absorption line strength that is the primary focus here (and in general when using unsaturated resonance lines as diagnostic tools). Moreover, in particular the κ 0 = 100 line with a void inter-clump medium shows a prominent absorption-dip toward the blue edge of the profile (see also Sundqvist et al 2010;Šurlan et al 2012). In the stochastic wind models, overlapping clumps in velocity space and the finite extent of the line profile lead to an increase in f vor at high velocities, and so results in more efficient absorption in the outermost wind than in the accelerating parts of it.…”
Section: Parameter Clump Volume Clump Velocity Porositymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effects of clumping on these and other spectral lines are well known and have been extensively discussed in the literature Bouret et al 2003Bouret et al , 2005Bouret et al , 2013Hillier et al 2003;Fullerton et al 2006;Martins et al 2007Martins et al , 2009Martins et al , 2012Oskinova et al 2007;Sundqvist et al 2010Sundqvist et al , 2011Šurlan et al 2012;Zsargó et al 2008).…”
Section: Effects Of Clumpingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To progress, a firm grasp on the underlying physical mechanisms which determine the wind structures is required. The state of affairs can be seen in recent literature where the values of observationally derived mass loss rates have swung back and forth by factors of 10 or more (Puls et al 2006, Massa et al 2003, Fullerton et al 2006, Sunqvist et al 2011, Surlan et al 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%