2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2019.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional prospectivity modeling of the Jiaojia-type gold deposit, Jiaodong Peninsula, Eastern China: A case study of the Dayingezhuang deposit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deep nature of this exploration means that only certain types of exploration tools can be used, such as geophysics and drilling based on structural and geophysical targeting [46][47][48][49][50]. Recent advances in three dimensional prospectivity modeling for mineral exploration has highlighted the potential use of prospectivity modeling [12][13][14][15][16] and numerical modeling [21] in this type of exploration targeting. However, the simulation undertaken during this study provides another method of predicting the location of areas that are prospective for deep exploration, supplementing more traditional exploration approaches, and removing risks related to the conditional dependence associated with some other types of prospectivity modeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The deep nature of this exploration means that only certain types of exploration tools can be used, such as geophysics and drilling based on structural and geophysical targeting [46][47][48][49][50]. Recent advances in three dimensional prospectivity modeling for mineral exploration has highlighted the potential use of prospectivity modeling [12][13][14][15][16] and numerical modeling [21] in this type of exploration targeting. However, the simulation undertaken during this study provides another method of predicting the location of areas that are prospective for deep exploration, supplementing more traditional exploration approaches, and removing risks related to the conditional dependence associated with some other types of prospectivity modeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid recent advancements in computing hardware and theoretical and applied computational science have enabled the development of prospectivity modeling [12][13][14][15][16] and the complex coupled numerical simulation of geological processes [17][18][19][20][21]. However, typical three-dimensional prospectivity modeling workflows (e.g., weights-of-evidence approaches) frequently encounter issues of conditional dependence, where datasets are biased by relationships where given exploration criteria can generate responses in different datasets, particular mineralizing processes can generate more than one exploration criteria, or responses present within one dataset can be conditioned by responses in another dataset [12].…”
Section: Of 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deep nature of this exploration means that only certain types of exploration tools can be used, such as geophysics and drilling based on structural and geophysical targeting [44][45][46][47][48]. Recent advances in 3D prospectivity modeling have highlighted the potential use of prospectivity [12][13][14][15][16] and numerical modeling [21] in exploration targeting. However, the simulation undertaken during this study provides an additional approach to identifying areas prospective for deep-seated exploration purely based on 3D numerical simulation, supplementing (although not replacing given the reliance of this approach on, e.g., geophysical data) more traditional exploration approaches and removing some of the risks conditional dependence-related risks associated with other types of prospectivity modeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid recent advancements in computing hardware and theoretical and applied computational science have enabled the development of three-dimensional prospectivity modeling (e.g., [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]) and the complex coupled numerical simulation of physical processes [19][20][21][22][23], including those involved in ore formation and mineralizing systems. However, traditional three-dimensional prospectivity modeling approaches (e.g., weights-of-evidence) frequently encounter issues related to conditional independence, where datasets are biased by relationships where given exploration criteria can generate responses in different datasets, particular mineralizing processes can generate more than one exploration criteria, or responses present within one dataset can be conditioned by responses in another dataset [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D spatial analysis has been demonstrated as an effective approach for identifying the spatial features of geological objects in 3D space and extracting diverse potential ore-controlling features for 3D prospectivity modeling [17][18][19][20][21][22]. However, the spatial association between ore and ore-controlling features would be significantly more complicated with the expansion of geological features in space [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%