2020
DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab56f9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional printing of chemically crosslinked gelatin hydrogels for adipose tissue engineering

Abstract: Despite their outstanding potential and the success that has already been achieved with three-dimensional (3D) printed hydrogel scaffolds, there has been little investigation into their application in the regeneration of damaged or missing adipose tissue (AT). Due to their macroscopic shape, microarchitecture, extracellular matrix-mimicking structure, degradability and soft tissue biomimetic mechanical properties, 3D printed hydrogel scaffolds have great potential for use in aesthetic, structural and functiona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Control and decellularized apple samples ( n = 4, Ø = 10 mm, t = 2 mm) were soaked in PBS at 37°C for 1 week (i.e., Δw plateau) and then tested in the swollen state by applying one hysteresis compression cycle. Each test consisted in a load phase at a rate of 2.5% min –1 down to −30% strain, as previously reported for adipose tissue engineering, ( Chang et al, 2013 ; Contessi Negrini et al, 2020 ) and subsequent unload phase at a rate of 5% min –1 . From the stress-strain curves, the elastic modulus E (calculated as the slope in the 0–5% strain range), stiffness k (slope in the 15–20% strain range), maximum stress σ max , residual strain ε res and hysteresis area H (calculated as the area between the load and unload curves) were calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control and decellularized apple samples ( n = 4, Ø = 10 mm, t = 2 mm) were soaked in PBS at 37°C for 1 week (i.e., Δw plateau) and then tested in the swollen state by applying one hysteresis compression cycle. Each test consisted in a load phase at a rate of 2.5% min –1 down to −30% strain, as previously reported for adipose tissue engineering, ( Chang et al, 2013 ; Contessi Negrini et al, 2020 ) and subsequent unload phase at a rate of 5% min –1 . From the stress-strain curves, the elastic modulus E (calculated as the slope in the 0–5% strain range), stiffness k (slope in the 15–20% strain range), maximum stress σ max , residual strain ε res and hysteresis area H (calculated as the area between the load and unload curves) were calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to incorporating fundamental features such as biocompatibility and biodegradability, classical TE scaffolds are designed to mimic the microarchitecture and mechanical properties of the mature tissue to be regenerated [ 9 , 10 ]. For instance, different scaffold designs include relatively stiff scaffolds with tuned porous structure for bone [ 11 , 12 ] and gradient porosity for osteochondral regeneration [ 13 , 14 ], scaffolds with preferential orientation for the regeneration of anisotropic tissues [ 15 , 16 ], or scaffolds with relatively soft mechanical properties and big pores for adipose tissue regeneration [ 17 , 18 ]. Classical TE strategies mainly aim at cell growth in a 3D structure and differentiation into the desired phenotype to form the mature tissue, pursued by guiding cell fate by modulating the scaffolds properties (e.g.…”
Section: Developmental Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 3D models were used to study adipocyte functions, less is known about whether tissue microstructure and stiffness, as well as other ECM components, influence adipogenesis. Besides collagen, other materials and bioprinting technology might support the design and study of adipogenesis, for example using methylated or crosslinked gelatin [ 119 , 120 ]. However, they are widely used in translational medicine, rather than in the basic research.…”
Section: Modeling Adipogenesis Via Three-dimensional (3d) Culturementioning
confidence: 99%