2020
DOI: 10.1080/16000870.2020.1811535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional potential vorticity structures for extreme precipitation events on the convective scale

Abstract: Three-dimensional potential vorticity (PV) structures on the convective scale during extreme precipitation events are investigated. Using the high resolution COSMO-REA2 data set, 3D composites of the PV, with and without Coriolis parameter and related variables, are evaluated for different classes of precipitation intensity. The development of a significant horizontal dipole structure in the immediate vicinity of the precipitation maximum and the updraft can be explained by the twisting term in the vorticity e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, second term). The formation of such quasi-horizontal PV dipole structures have been found in idealized simulations of isolated cumulus-scale convection (Chagnon and Gray, 2009), in case studies of mesoscale convective systems (Davis and Weisman, 1994;Chagnon and Gray, 2009;Hitchman and Rowe, 2017;Clarke et al, 2019), in mid-latitude convective updrafts with varying large-scale flow conditions (Weijenborg et al, 2015(Weijenborg et al, , 2017Müller et al, 2020), and embedded in the baroclinic WCB ascent region (Harvey et al, 2020;Oertel et al, 2020). These PV anomalies can reach a magnitude of ±10 PVU and hence exceed the typical range of synopticscale PV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, second term). The formation of such quasi-horizontal PV dipole structures have been found in idealized simulations of isolated cumulus-scale convection (Chagnon and Gray, 2009), in case studies of mesoscale convective systems (Davis and Weisman, 1994;Chagnon and Gray, 2009;Hitchman and Rowe, 2017;Clarke et al, 2019), in mid-latitude convective updrafts with varying large-scale flow conditions (Weijenborg et al, 2015(Weijenborg et al, , 2017Müller et al, 2020), and embedded in the baroclinic WCB ascent region (Harvey et al, 2020;Oertel et al, 2020). These PV anomalies can reach a magnitude of ±10 PVU and hence exceed the typical range of synopticscale PV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The radar reflectivity structure of convective clouds is relatively heterogeneous compared to homogeneous stratiform clouds (e.g., Steiner et al, 1995) and often appears as confined towers (Hogan et al, 2002;Murphy et al, 2017). Here, we visually identify convective regions, where narrow plumes of increased values of Z rise above the 0 • C isotherm (see Hogan et al, 2002;Murphy et al, 2017;Oertel et al, 2019). Further applied indications for convective activity are locally enhanced radar reflectivity, a broken cloud top, spatially heterogeneous cloud top height and the absence of a pronounced radar bright band.…”
Section: Airborne Radar Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of such quasi-horizontal PV dipole structures have been found in idealized simulations of isolated cumulusscale convection (Chagnon and Gray, 2009), in case studies of mesoscale convective systems (Davis and Weisman, 1994;Chagnon and Gray, 2009;Hitchman and Rowe, 2017;Clarke et al, 2019), in mid-latitude convective updrafts with varying large-scale flow conditions (Weijenborg et al, 2015(Weijenborg et al, , 2017Müller et al, 2020), and embedded in the baroclinic WCB ascent region (Harvey et al, 2020;Oertel et al, 2020). These PV anomalies can reach a magnitude of ±10 PVU, and hence, exceed the typical range of synoptic-scale PV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Various energetic variable are applicable on large scale. A potential driver to control small scale models is the Dynamic State Index (DSI) (Müller et al, 2020;Müller and Névir, 2019), an "adiabaticity indicator". Other large scale variables driving the smaller scale stochastics are the available moisture or vertical wind shear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size of the reanalysis data set used in Sect. As vertical layer the 600 hPa surface is considered, because here the latent heat release takes place and the vertical velocity reaches its maximum, as shown in (Müller et al, 2020).…”
Section: Meteorological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%