Three-dimensional Obturation “Thrill to fill”

Abstract

To compare and evaluate the volume inadequacy of two different obturation techniques using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in an in vitro study. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of two obturation techniques, namely, Calamus and Thermafil, via volume rendering method utilizing a three-dimensional (3D) cone beam computed tomography. Results: There is a statistical difference between the Thermafil and Calamus with regard to the adequacy of obturation. The 3D obturating material Calamus has less volume inadequacy as compared to Thermafil. Conclusion: The adequacy of obturation was better with Calamus than with Thermafil. But the research with regard to Calamus and Thermafil still continues in endodontics as a 3D obturating material.