2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional neuron–muscle constructs with neuromuscular junctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
179
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
179
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these studies, scaffold delivery of VEGF and IGF resulted in a 2.4-fold increase in peak tetanic force over blank scaffolds, whereas scaffold delivery of VEGF, IGF, and myoblasts resulted in 1.5-6.0-fold increases in peak tetanic force over control conditions (13,32,39). Although additional biomaterial-based approaches have induced similar improvements in muscle function through the codelivery of myogenic bioagents with endothelial cells to enhance vascularization (5.5-fold increase in active stress over blank scaffold) or neural stem cells to promote innervation of muscle constructs (2.0-fold increase in maximum tetanic force over nerve-deficient controls) (44)(45)(46)(47), no bioagents were delivered from the scaffolds in this study. It is possible that the magnetic field directly affected regeneration in the current study, as past studies involving treatment of myoblasts and myotubes with static magnetic fields have demonstrated increased myogenic differentiation and cell alignment (48,49).…”
Section: Markers Of Muscle Regeneration: Centrally Located Nuclei Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, scaffold delivery of VEGF and IGF resulted in a 2.4-fold increase in peak tetanic force over blank scaffolds, whereas scaffold delivery of VEGF, IGF, and myoblasts resulted in 1.5-6.0-fold increases in peak tetanic force over control conditions (13,32,39). Although additional biomaterial-based approaches have induced similar improvements in muscle function through the codelivery of myogenic bioagents with endothelial cells to enhance vascularization (5.5-fold increase in active stress over blank scaffold) or neural stem cells to promote innervation of muscle constructs (2.0-fold increase in maximum tetanic force over nerve-deficient controls) (44)(45)(46)(47), no bioagents were delivered from the scaffolds in this study. It is possible that the magnetic field directly affected regeneration in the current study, as past studies involving treatment of myoblasts and myotubes with static magnetic fields have demonstrated increased myogenic differentiation and cell alignment (48,49).…”
Section: Markers Of Muscle Regeneration: Centrally Located Nuclei Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we increased the glutamate concentration from 200 to 400 μM, the frequency of muscle twitching increased from 1.08 to 1.33 contractions per second, whereas the average displacement decreased from 6.3 ± 0 to 4.4 ± 0.2 μm per twitch (Figure 6e and Supplementary Video S4). The addition of 25 μM tubocurarine chloride (curare), an irreversible nicotinic NMJ antagonist and muscle relaxant 23 that blocks AChRs, halted the contractions; no further muscle twitching was observed.…”
Section: Chemical Stimulation Of Mns In Multi-layered Tissue Ringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond applications in regenerative medicine and therapeutics 20 , however, only a few studies have produced 3D NMJ platforms or applied neuromuscular research to living cellular systems using embryonic or neural stem cells [21][22][23] . Furthermore, there is a lack of research demonstrating the possibility of translating such an arrangement into a platform that is potentially autonomous, scalable, and forward-engineered, which are necessary characteristics of a mobile and functional cellular system or machine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these problems, different in vitro coculture systems have been set up in which motor neuron and skeletal muscle are grown together in order to recapitulate the formation and eventual disruption of the NMJ. To date, co-culture methods established from various species have been described, including mouse (Morimoto et al, 2013;Zahavi et al, 2015), rat (Das et al, 2010;Southam et al, 2013), Xenopus (Lu et al, 1996;Peng et al, 2003) and chick (Frank and Fischbach, 1979), and also heterologous co-cultures built from motor neuron and muscle cells obtained from different species, such as rat-human , mouse-human (Son et al, 2011) and mouse-chick (Soundararajan et al, 2007). However, these co-culture methods resulted in the formation of immature myofibers (thin muscle fiber, with centrally localized nuclei and no transversal triads) with immature sarcomeric structures (Das et al, 2007(Das et al, , 2009Southam et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%