2009
DOI: 10.1002/ange.200901668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three‐Dimensional Nanostructured Substrates toward Efficient Capture of Circulating Tumor Cells

Abstract: Zellfänger: Eine dreidimensionale Nanostruktur aus säulenartig angeordneten Si‐Nanostäben (SiNPs), die mit dem Antikörper anti‐EpCAM (EpCAM: Epithelzelladhäsionsmolekül) bedeckt sind, zeigt verstärkte lokale topographische Wechselwirkungen zwischen nanoskaligen Zelloberflächenkomponenten und dem Substrat. Dies erhöht die Effizienz der Zellfixierung bei der Isolierung lebensfähiger Krebszellen aus Vollblutproben (siehe Schema und REM‐Bild einer fixierten Krebszelle).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figures 4a, an average capture efficiency of 80.9 % was obtained in lysed blood, indicating that cell-imprinted gelatin grafted with anti-EpCAM exhibits sensitive and specific performance for capturing EpCAM-positive cells. A capture efficiency of 52 % was obtained in whole blood sample, which was comparable to other static CTC detection devices, including such as vertically oriented silicon nanopillars, 56 horizontally packed electrospun TiO 2 nanofiber, 53 and fractal nanostructured Au Interfaces. 22 The decreased capture efficiency in whole blood was possibly caused by the blockage from red blood cells and the reduced interaction chance between conjugate and the target cells.…”
Section: Template Preparation and Stamp Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…As shown in Figures 4a, an average capture efficiency of 80.9 % was obtained in lysed blood, indicating that cell-imprinted gelatin grafted with anti-EpCAM exhibits sensitive and specific performance for capturing EpCAM-positive cells. A capture efficiency of 52 % was obtained in whole blood sample, which was comparable to other static CTC detection devices, including such as vertically oriented silicon nanopillars, 56 horizontally packed electrospun TiO 2 nanofiber, 53 and fractal nanostructured Au Interfaces. 22 The decreased capture efficiency in whole blood was possibly caused by the blockage from red blood cells and the reduced interaction chance between conjugate and the target cells.…”
Section: Template Preparation and Stamp Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Immunoassay-based detection including micro/nanostructured surfaces or immune-magnetic beads is more commonly used which rely primarily on antigen-antibody affinity by recognizing tumor-specific markers especially epithelial cell adhesion molecules (EpCAM) to capture targeted cancer cells. [20][21][22] Micro/nanostructures-based approaches often use complicated structures, such as arrays of microposts, 23 nanopillars, 24,25 nanowires, 26 nanofibers, 27 and nanodots 28 to enhance the interactions with cells, improving the capture efficiency to target cells. Alternatively, benefiting from easy manipulation, fast magnetic response and high capture efficiency, immunomagnetic-based assays have been widely applied to CTCs detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as cells move through the microchannel and fail to interact with the antibody-coated surface, we observed cells beginning to clump, further decreasing the possibility of capture. In order to increase cell-antibody interactions, one could incorporate a herringbone design to promote mixing (Mittal et al 2012;Stott et al 2010;Wang et al 2011a) or could increase the effective surface area, for example, by incorporating antibodyfunctionalized microposts in addition to a functionalized solid surface (Gleghorn et al 2010;Nagrath et al 2007;Wang et al 2009). …”
Section: Antibody-functionalized Microfluidic Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%