Computers in Cardiology 1994
DOI: 10.1109/cic.1994.470181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional movement analysis in digital subtraction angiography: symbol generation from 3-D optical flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since problems to be solved for both steps are to globally minimize a predefined function (i.e., energy function for sequential reconstruction and matching error function for motion estimation), both of the optimization problems can be solved with dynamic programming, an efficient optimization tool, to obtain global optimums with low computation cost and numerical stability. Compared with the method in [20,[22][23][24][25][26][27], not only possible errors introduced by calibration parameters of the imaging system are avoided, but also estimation procedures are simplified. And application of DP algorithm ensures low computation cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since problems to be solved for both steps are to globally minimize a predefined function (i.e., energy function for sequential reconstruction and matching error function for motion estimation), both of the optimization problems can be solved with dynamic programming, an efficient optimization tool, to obtain global optimums with low computation cost and numerical stability. Compared with the method in [20,[22][23][24][25][26][27], not only possible errors introduced by calibration parameters of the imaging system are avoided, but also estimation procedures are simplified. And application of DP algorithm ensures low computation cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The major drawback of the conventional optical-flow-based methods [20,[22][23][24][25][26][27] mentioned in Section 1.2.2 is that errors existing in calibration parameters of the imaging system may be introduced into motion estimation results again during backprojection. Also, results of OF-based methods are sensitive to possible noises existing in the images because the OF field of the target is obtained according to partial derivatives of the intensity value of each pixel with respect to the pixel's position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations