Three-dimensional microfluidic model for tumor cell intravasation and endothelial barrier function

Abstract

Entry of tumor cells into the blood stream is a critical step in cancer metastasis. Although significant progress has been made in visualizing tumor cell motility in vivo, the underlying mechanism of cancer cell intravasation remains largely unknown. We developed a microfluidic-based assay to recreate the tumor-vascular interface in three-dimensions, allowing for high resolution, real-time imaging, and precise quantification of endothelial barrier function. Studies are aimed at testing the hypothesis that carcinoma cell intravasation is regulated by biochemical factors from the interacting cells and cellular interactions with macrophages. We developed a method to measure spatially resolved endothelial permeability and show that signaling with macrophages via secretion of tumor necrosis factor alpha results in endothelial barrier impairment. Under these conditions intravasation rates were increased as validated with live imaging. To further investigate tumor-endothelial (TC-EC) signaling, we used highly invasive fibrosarcoma cells and quantified tumor cell migration dynamics and TC-EC interactions under control and perturbed (with tumor necrosis factor alpha) barrier conditions. We found that endothelial barrier impairment was associated with a higher number and faster dynamics of TC-EC interactions, in agreement with our carcinoma intravasation results. Taken together our results provide evidence that the endothelium poses a barrier to tumor cell intravasation that can be regulated by factors present in the tumor microenvironment.T umor-endothelial cell interactions are critical in multiple steps during cancer metastasis, ranging from cancer angiogenesis to colonization. Cancer cell intravasation is a rate-limiting step in metastasis that regulates the number of circulating tumor cells and thus presents high risk for the formation of secondary tumors (1, 2). During the metastatic process tumor cells migrate out of the primary tumor (3), navigate into a complex tumor microenvironment, and enter into blood vessels (4). Cell-cell communication and chemotaxis (5) are key to this process and can occur via paracrine signals and/or direct contact between different cell types during tumor cell invasion (6) and metastatic colonization (7). Studies using multiphoton imaging in animal models have demonstrated that the ability of tumor cells to enter into the blood stream can be controlled both by tumor cell intrinsic factors (8-11) and other cells present in the tumor microenvironment, such as macrophages (12) and neutrophils (13). However, because of the lack of physiologically relevant in vitro models and the challenges of investigating cell-cell interactions in vivo, the underlying mechanism of intravasation remains poorly understood (14). In particular, a number of fundamental questions remain as to whether intravasation is an active or passive process (15) and whether tumor cells cross the endothelial barrier through cell-cell junctions (paracellular) or through the endothelial cell body [transcellular (16)]. Therefor...

Human 3D vascularized organotypic microfluidic assays to study breast cancer cell extravasation

“…Various microfluidic models have been developed for studying tumor angiogenesis (18), transition to invasion (19), intravasation (20), the role of interstitial flow (21) and matrix stiffness (22) on…”

Monocytes and Macrophages in Cancer: Development and Functions

“…Intravital multi-photon microscopy showed that tumor cell intravasation occurs through clusters of macrophages located on the abluminal side of the vessels [83]. Recently, Zervantonakis and colleagues described a three-dimensional micro-fluidic model to test tumor cell intravasation and endothelial barrier permeability [84]. They reported that macrophage production of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) resulted in endothelial barrier impairment and a higher intravasation rate.…”

Oriented collagen fibers direct tumor cell intravasation

“…The heterogeneous Collagen I orientation was induced by internally developing strain fields due to the Matrigel volume swelling upon setting (25)(26)(27)(28)(29). Fig.…”