2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional Mapping of Pipeline from Inside Images Using Earthworm Robot Equipped with Camera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the different mechanical structures and movement modes of robots, they are usually divided into fluid type, wheel type, crawler type, crawling type, creeping type, spiral type, and bionic type 2 . Among them, the typical ones are the earthworm creeping pipeline robot developed by Chuo University in Japan 3 , and an elliptical crawler pipeline robot developed by Longgu University in Japan 4 , Southwest Petroleum University has created an active screw pipe robot 5 , and Beijing Jiaotong University has created a mobile robot with multiple motion modes based on parallel mechanisms 6 . However, there are currently a number of issues with pipeline robots, including a single detection mode, a limited range of pipe diameter changes, and poor pipeline passing and adaptability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the different mechanical structures and movement modes of robots, they are usually divided into fluid type, wheel type, crawler type, crawling type, creeping type, spiral type, and bionic type 2 . Among them, the typical ones are the earthworm creeping pipeline robot developed by Chuo University in Japan 3 , and an elliptical crawler pipeline robot developed by Longgu University in Japan 4 , Southwest Petroleum University has created an active screw pipe robot 5 , and Beijing Jiaotong University has created a mobile robot with multiple motion modes based on parallel mechanisms 6 . However, there are currently a number of issues with pipeline robots, including a single detection mode, a limited range of pipe diameter changes, and poor pipeline passing and adaptability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%