2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2010.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional magnetic reconnection regimes: A review

Abstract: The magnetic field in many astrophysical plasmas -such as the Solar corona and Earth's magnetosphere -has been shown to have a highly complex, three-dimensional structure. Recent advances in theory and computational simulations have shown that reconnection in these fields also has a threedimensional nature, in contrast to the widely used two-dimensional (or 2.5-dimensional) models. Here we discuss the underlying theory of three-dimensional magnetic reconnection. We also review a selection of new models that il… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
120
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
3
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is also highlighted in Fig. 12 of Pontin (2011), in order to demonstrate the relative complexity of such a model compared with early separator reconnection models. Protons are affected to a greater extent than the electrons by the twisting of magnetic field around the separator since they travel slower than electrons and, therefore, remain in the reconnection region for longer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect is also highlighted in Fig. 12 of Pontin (2011), in order to demonstrate the relative complexity of such a model compared with early separator reconnection models. Protons are affected to a greater extent than the electrons by the twisting of magnetic field around the separator since they travel slower than electrons and, therefore, remain in the reconnection region for longer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in 3D, the presence of a localised A&A 574, A7 (2015) non-ideal region (where there exists some component of electric field parallel to the magnetic field) means that this simple "cut and paste" picture of field line reconnection no longer holds; instead magnetic flux is reconnected continually and continuously throughout the non-ideal region (for reviews of 3D magnetic reconnection, see e.g. Priest & Forbes 2000;Birn & Priest 2007;Pontin 2011). Hence, one could view the work presented here as a natural extension of previous work to three dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we finish by noting that solar nulls are unlikely to be current-free (potential), as is found to be the case in field extrapolations (e.g., Valori et al 2012;Sun et al 2012). Non-potential nulls are more topologically complicated and asymmetric than the potential class (examples of non-potential fieldline geometry can be found in, e.g., Al Hachani & Pontin 2010;Pontin et al 2011;Pontin 2011). Currently, it is unclear to what extent the above results hold in the case of non-potential null points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, full 3D initial configurations can lead to very different outcomes, as suggested by the few existing kinetic studies (Baumann & Nordlund 2012;Olshevsky et al 2013). Reconnection and particle acceleration at 3D nulls or at quasi separatrix layers (Pontin 2011) deserves further research.…”
Section: Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%