2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-8018(01)00087-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional Lump-Mass formulation of a catenary riser with bending, torsion and irregular seabed interaction effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By now, several models of seabed mechanics have been proposed [6,[9][10][11] . In this paper, we proposed a new kind of seabed model, which can account for rebound, friction, impact in three dimensions.…”
Section: Seabed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By now, several models of seabed mechanics have been proposed [6,[9][10][11] . In this paper, we proposed a new kind of seabed model, which can account for rebound, friction, impact in three dimensions.…”
Section: Seabed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there are considerable amount of papers proposing various methods for the dynamic and static analysis of towed cable since the 1960's [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] . The behavior of towed cable under a variety of conditions has been fully examined, such as low-tension cable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the lumped mass model, mooring line is spatial discretized into lumped mass nodes which are connected by massless springs. Discretization in this way simplifies the problem and provides numerical efficiency, which has been performed in many other studies (Chai et al, 2002;Huang, 1994;Leonard and Nath, 1981;Low and Langley, 2006;Orcina, 2009). Furthermore, each item in the lumped mass model has a clear physical meaning, which facilitates the inclusion of the soil-chain interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, most of these studies focus on the suspended component in the water such as the method adopted in commercial codes Riflex, Cable3D and Orcaflex (Fylling et al, 2008;Ma and Webster, 1994;Orcina, 2009) . In these studies, anchors are assumed to be a fixed point located at the surface of the seabed (Kim et al, 2013(Kim et al, , 2005Tahar and Kim, 2003) and the seabed is modelled as a rigid plane or an elastic spring (Chai et al, 2002;Ma and Webster, 1994). This process has ignored the chainsoil interactions, which may not be safe for a semi-taut or taut mooring system as stated above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chai et al [5] proposed a three-dimensional lump-mass formulation for riser structure analysis which is capable of handling irregular seabed interaction. They adopted a simplified model by replacing the seabed surface with an elastic foundation with independent elastic springs having an arbitrary thickness which maybe critically damped.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%