1988
DOI: 10.1002/cm.970100106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three‐dimensional light microscopy of diploid Drosophila chromosomes

Abstract: Fluorescence microscopy, uniquely, provides the ability to examine specific components within intact, even living, cells. Unfortunately, high-resolution conventional fluorescence microscopy is intrinsically a two-dimensional technique and performs poorly with specimens thicker than about 0.5 micron. Probing the spatial organization of components within cells has required the development of new methods optimized for three-dimensional data collection, processing, display, and interpretation. Our interest in unde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since image quality was visibly better towards the center of the maximum image frame of 1024 × 1024 pixels, we decided to use an image frame of 768 × 768 pixels. Three-dimensional deconvolution microscopy [7] requires acquisition of a stack of images at narrowly spaced parallel focal planes. Microscope objectives also collect light from out-offocus objects, which normally blurs each image.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since image quality was visibly better towards the center of the maximum image frame of 1024 × 1024 pixels, we decided to use an image frame of 768 × 768 pixels. Three-dimensional deconvolution microscopy [7] requires acquisition of a stack of images at narrowly spaced parallel focal planes. Microscope objectives also collect light from out-offocus objects, which normally blurs each image.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional deconvolution microscopy [7] requires acquisition of a stack of images at narrowly spaced parallel focal planes. Microscope objectives also collect light from out-offocus objects, which normally blurs each image.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dramatic contrast, the diameter of a polytene nucleus is 30/zm and each polytene chromosome has a width of 3 #m. Thus, an increase of nearly an order of magnitude in resolution over that obtained for the studies on polytene chromosomes was required to examine diploid chromosomes. Recent technological developments in light microscopy, using computational image processing (reviewed in Agard et al, 1989;Fay et al, 1989) or confocal microscopes (reviewed in Brakenhoff et al, 1989) to remove out-of-focus image information, have made it possible to examine the three-dimensional organization of diploid chrom'osomes directly in intact cells (Agard et al, 1988;Rawlins and Shaw, 1988;Oud et al, 1989). Unfortunately, currently available confocal microscopes have proved to be too insensitive to record useful three-dimensional data for the very small Drosophila embryonic chromosomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But biological samples are three-dimensional, and microscopy has increasingly been used over the past three-decades to develop three-dimensional fluorescence images by moving the focal plane of the microscope objective through the depth of the sample to create a stack of two-dimensional views. [1][2][3] In three-dimensional microscopy, as the imaging plane moves deeper into the sample, the image quality becomes degraded due to optical aberrations and scattering. Both scattering and optical aberrations are caused by refractive index variations, but scattering is the result of sub-micron inhomogeneities in the tissue and can best be treated as multiple scattering events in the sample which lead to a randomized phase and amplitude distribution of the light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%