2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional kinematics of the pelvis and hind limbs in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and human bipedal walking

Abstract: The common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) is a facultative biped and our closest living relative. As such, the musculoskeletal anatomies of their pelvis and hind limbs have long provided a comparative context for studies of human and fossil hominin locomotion. Yet, how the chimpanzee pelvis and hind limb actually move during bipedal walking is still not well defined. Here, we describe the three-dimensional (3-D) kinematics of the pelvis, hip, knee and ankle during bipedal walking and compare those values to huma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
94
3
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
12
94
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that the greater MTU length changes and greater mass-specific force-generating capacity of the human TFL result in greater peak strains in the human anterior ITB than the chimp anterior FL. The anterior ITB in humans stretches more than the anterior FL in chimps because humans walk with greater hip flexion/extension excursion than chimps (O'Neill et al, 2015). Contrary to our hypothesis, peak strains in the posterior ITB and posterior FL are similar in our models.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We found that the greater MTU length changes and greater mass-specific force-generating capacity of the human TFL result in greater peak strains in the human anterior ITB than the chimp anterior FL. The anterior ITB in humans stretches more than the anterior FL in chimps because humans walk with greater hip flexion/extension excursion than chimps (O'Neill et al, 2015). Contrary to our hypothesis, peak strains in the posterior ITB and posterior FL are similar in our models.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…7). However, because humans extend their hips more than chimps during bipedal walking (∼45 deg range in humans, from −20 deg extension to 25 deg flexion, versus ∼25 deg range in chimps, from 25 to 50 deg flexion; O'Neill et al, 2015), human ITB MTUs undergo substantially greater length changes than chimp FL MTUs throughout the gait cycle (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Comparison Of Elastic Energy Storage Capacity During Bipedalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two chimpanzees studied in these experiments walk bipedally with a more flexed lower limb posture at foot strike than modern humans (approx. 458 of hip flexion and 258 of knee flexion [24]). As such, the relatively shallow toe depths of the Laetoli G1 footprints are in fact compatible with a form of bipedalism involving a more flexed limb posture than is observed in the normal gait of modern humans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinematic analyses were not conducted in this particular set of chimpanzee experiments, due to logistical constraints and because bipedal hind limb kinematics of these two chimpanzees are already known from other studies [24].…”
Section: (B) Chimpanzee Footprint Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%