2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0141-6359(02)00225-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional kinematical analyses for surface grinding of large scale substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A kinematical analysis is useful to address the behavior of each grain in wafer surface generation (Zhou, et al, 2002, 2003, Chen and Hsu, 2006, 2008. The 3D model of rotational in-feed grinding method is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Kinematical Analyses 31 3d Cutting Path and Resultant Wafermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A kinematical analysis is useful to address the behavior of each grain in wafer surface generation (Zhou, et al, 2002, 2003, Chen and Hsu, 2006, 2008. The 3D model of rotational in-feed grinding method is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Kinematical Analyses 31 3d Cutting Path and Resultant Wafermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6, where the initial The rest parameters used for analysis are listed in Table 2. In a coordinate system that the origin is fixed at the center of the wafer, the position of the grain after t seconds [ ( ) ( ) ( )] is described as follows (Zhou, et al, 2003);…”
Section: Kinematical Analyses 31 3d Cutting Path and Resultant Wafermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such atomic-bit processing in abrasive machining means that the undeformed chip thickness must be at least of the sub-nanometre order. Recently, most ultraprecision grinding systems utilize the infeed method to keep the "constant" area unchanged and thereby to deliver a stable grinding performance in the grinding process [43]. The grinding set-up in this investigation consisted of a vertical grinding spindle and a cup-shaped, metal-bonded tool arranged for planar grinding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually six DOFs are needed for two types of alignment, including in-plane alignment (by adjustment of x axis, y and theta z) and off-plane alignment (by adjustment of z, theta x and theta y). According to the existing literatures, the error of in-plane alignment has already been less than 10 nm, while the off-plane alignment, which guarantees the uniformity of the imprint force, is still a problem to be resolved [10]- [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%