2013
DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2012.759614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional kinematic comparison of treadmill and overground running

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
64
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the current investigation provide further evidence for the existence of planar crosstalk and agree with the conclusions of Sinclair et al [10], Lees et al [11] and Kadaba et al [12]. Observation of the angular profiles and statistical data suggests that it was stable across the range of joints in all planes of rotation and typically (although not universally) associated with the lowest degree of crosstalk.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the current investigation provide further evidence for the existence of planar crosstalk and agree with the conclusions of Sinclair et al [10], Lees et al [11] and Kadaba et al [12]. Observation of the angular profiles and statistical data suggests that it was stable across the range of joints in all planes of rotation and typically (although not universally) associated with the lowest degree of crosstalk.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Sinclair et al [3] examined only ankle joint kinematics, during which no significant alterations were observed, thus it is likely Sinclair et al [3] were overly expansive in their conclusions having only considered ankle joint kinematics during gait. Secondly, the extent of sagittal plane movement during cycling is considerably greater than during normal running gait [10], thus the potential for alterations in the sagittal plane waveforms is accentuated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have compared motorised treadmill vs overground locomotion to examine kinematics [1], ground reaction forces [2] and muscular activation differences [3,4,5]. Similarly, non-motorised treadmill and overground locomotion have been compared for 5000 m performance time, electromyography (EMG), blood lactate, oxygen uptake kinetics, heart rate [6], maximal sprinting performance [7] and 6-minute walk distance [8] that have all highlighted dissimilarities between the conditions which could affect the mechanical loading environment and also the musculoskeletal adaptations generated by different locomotion conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As overground running is still the most common running modality, the generalizability of the findings is limited. because running mechanics have been shown to differ between treadmill and overground locomotion [23], future work should seek to repeat the present study using an overground running protocol. In addition, the positioning of the retroreflective markers onto the shoe may not have quantified movement of the foot within the shoe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%