Three-Dimensional Imaging and Templating Improve Glenoid Implant Positioning

Iannotti, Joseph P.; Weiner, Scott D.; Rodriguez, Eric; Subhas, Naveen; Patterson, Thomas E.; Jun, Bong Jae; Ricchetti, Eric T.

doi:10.2106/jbjs.n.00493

Cited by 167 publications

(132 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

123

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the longer term, this technology may prove to be of lower cost than single-use PSIs and should result in a reduction of the time from planning to use of the instrument. 1 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Improperly-placed implants are at risk of dislocation, increased component wear and loosening, and the need for revision surgery. 1-3 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This type of pre-operative planning has grown in popularity across a wide range of orthopaedic subspecialties including total hip and knee arthroplasty, pelvic and acetabular procedures and spinal deformities, with varying degrees of success. 1 It is the most recent development in this field, and its effectiveness in both the version and inclination planes of glenoid component placement has been demonstrated for both total anatomical and reverse shoulder arthroplasties. 1,5,10,11 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1 It is the most recent development in this field, and its effectiveness in both the version and inclination planes of glenoid component placement has been demonstrated for both total anatomical and reverse shoulder arthroplasties. 1,5,10,11 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Patient-specific instrumentation for total shoulder arthroplasty

Gomes

2016

EFORT Open Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Shoulder arthroplasty is a demanding procedure with a known complication rate. Most complications are associated with the glenoid component, a fact that has stimulated investigation into that specific component of the implant. Avoiding glenoid component malposition is very important and is a key reason for recent developments in pre-operative planning and instrumentation to minimise risk.Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was developed as an alternative to navigation systems, originally for total knee arthroplasty, and is a valid option for shoulder replacements today. It offers increased accuracy in the placement of the glenoid component, which improves the likelihood of an optimal outcome.A description of the method of pre-operative planning and surgical technique is presented, based on the author’s experience and a review of the current literature.Cite this article: Gomes N. Patient-specific instrumentation for total shoulder arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:177-182. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000033.

show abstract

“…In the longer term, this technology may prove to be of lower cost than single-use PSIs and should result in a reduction of the time from planning to use of the instrument. 1 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Improperly-placed implants are at risk of dislocation, increased component wear and loosening, and the need for revision surgery. 1-3 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Patient-specific instrumentation for total shoulder arthroplasty

Gomes

2016

EFORT Open Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…When correctly placed, the patient's native premorbid version, inclination, and joint line can be determined and serve as references for selection of optimal implant type and location. 41,[50][51][52] 3D Templating, Planning Software, and Standard Instrumentation: From the preoperative plan, the location and orientation of the guide pin used for bone preparation and implant placement are defined within the software. The templated 3D images, along with the corresponding serial 2D images in 3 planes, oriented relative to the plane of the scapula, give a very accurate representation of the location of the guide pin and implant relative to the bony anatomy.…”

Section: Joseph P Iannotti MD Phdmentioning

confidence: 99%

Controversies in Shoulder Arthroplasty

Throckmorton

Tashjian

Keener

et al. 2015

Techniques in Shoulder &Amp; Elbow Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Areas of current controversy concerning shoulder arthroplasty include management of glenoid bone loss, the role of patientspecific instrumentation, differing design features of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and options for humeral fixation in primary and revision procedures. At the 2015 meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, shoulder arthroplasty specialists presented a symposium on these controversial topics. In each area, surgeons presented their case for a given position on these issues. This article is a summary of those proceedings.

show abstract