2013
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2013.2243413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Identification of Crack Location in Conducting Slabs Using Wavelets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…highlight the ability of the proposed approach to cancel out the device response and, thus, reconstruct a very close three dimensional image of the assumed crack. Moreover, crack dimensions do not necessarily have to be in quanta of the FT discretization grid unlike for the case of using the wavelets approach (refer, for instance, to [9]). …”
Section: The Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…highlight the ability of the proposed approach to cancel out the device response and, thus, reconstruct a very close three dimensional image of the assumed crack. Moreover, crack dimensions do not necessarily have to be in quanta of the FT discretization grid unlike for the case of using the wavelets approach (refer, for instance, to [9]). …”
Section: The Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those techniques, stray magnetic field monitoring, as a result of impressed current crack perturbation, has proven to be successful [6,7]. Recently, the wavelets approach has been utilized in surface crack detection using impressed current differential measurements [8,9]. In this approach, semiorthogonal compactly supported spline wavelets were used to efficiently solve the resulting 2D Fredholm integral equation of the first kind and, finally, identify the 3D spatial location of cracks in conducting slabs of finite thicknesses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%