Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COM 2014
DOI: 10.7712/120113.4822.c1040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Finite Element Modelling of Dynamic Pile-Soil-Pile Interaction in Time Domain

Abstract: Abstract. Dynamic analysis of embedded foundations like pile groups have received consid-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A constraint function is applied to ensure that all the nodes at the top of the pile have the same vertical displacement. The size of the mesh elements and the domain are selected to satisfy classical rules 24 : per Rayleigh wavelength, λR$\lambda _R$, there should be a minimum of 10 elements to have a high spatial resolution of propagating waves, and the minimum domain size should be greater than 3λR$3\lambda _R$ to prevent reflections at the boundaries. The mesh widths are 120 m for L/d=15$L/d=15$, 190 m for L/d=25$L/d=25$ and 380 m for L/d=50$L/d=50$.…”
Section: Dynamic Pile Head Stiffness and Dampingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A constraint function is applied to ensure that all the nodes at the top of the pile have the same vertical displacement. The size of the mesh elements and the domain are selected to satisfy classical rules 24 : per Rayleigh wavelength, λR$\lambda _R$, there should be a minimum of 10 elements to have a high spatial resolution of propagating waves, and the minimum domain size should be greater than 3λR$3\lambda _R$ to prevent reflections at the boundaries. The mesh widths are 120 m for L/d=15$L/d=15$, 190 m for L/d=25$L/d=25$ and 380 m for L/d=50$L/d=50$.…”
Section: Dynamic Pile Head Stiffness and Dampingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the accuracy of responses for surrounding soil has not been confirmed . In this section, three‐dimensional finite element (FE) simulation through Abaqus software is done to reveal the wave propagation involving dynamic pile‐to‐pile interaction in the form of amplitude and phase 31,34,46 . The material assumption and geometrical settings are same with that in Section 2.…”
Section: Validation and Correction Of The Dynamic Pile‐soil‐pile Interaction Through Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21] Nowadays, four types of method have been developed to obtain both soil attenuation factor and dynamic interaction factor between adjacent piles: (a) the formulation based on Voigt model [22][23][24] ; (b) the formulation from plane stain method 18,[25][26][27][28] ; (c) analytical methods based on continuum model 20,29,30 ; (d) numerical approaches based on the finite element method (FEM), the difference method, the boundary element method or discrete element method. 21,[31][32][33][34][35] The numerical calculation in dynamic domain often requires a cumbersome discretization treatment, 36,37 and significant running time and computer resources, which usually means high cost in engineering design. The spring and damping coefficient in Voigt models are empirical and have to be calibrated before application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%